Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

The 10 Worst Microsoft Product Names of All Time

By Harry Mccracken, PC World
March 30, 2009 01:57 PM ET
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

If Microsoft had invented the iPod, it would have been called the Microsoft I-pod Pro 2005 Human Ear Professional Edition. The cult-hit video that makes that assertion may have been a joke, but it rings true. And when word emerged that the video was a self-parody produced within Microsoft, the point was even clearer: The world's largest software developer just isn't very good at naming stuff.

Some Microsoft names sound clunky; some are confusing; some are undignified or overambitious. More than any other company in technology, the Redmond powerhouse loves to change product names--often replacing one lackluster label with an equally uninspired one. Microsoft has also been known to mess up some names that are actually perfectly good, such as Windows and Word, by needlessly tampering with them.

Herewith, in chronological order, are ten Microsoft names that could have been a lot better, together with some semiconstructive advice on monikers that would have more euphonious and/or more accurate. I also selected six not-quite-as-bad runners-up.

1993: Word 6.0 for Windows: When Microsoft upgraded 1991's popular Word 2.0 for Windows, it replaced it with...no, not something logical like Word 3.0. Rather, it blithely hopscotched over three version numbers and landed at Word 6.0. The official explanation for the skippage was that it brought the Windows edition's version number into line with that of the older DOS incarnation of Word. But conspiracy theorists noted that it also allowed Word to catch up with archrival WordPerfect, which also released a version 6.0 in 1993.

Whatever the rationale, the move rendered the practical purpose of version numbers meaningless, thereby setting a bad example for other companies such as Netscape, which later went straight from Netscape Navigator 4.0 to version 6.0.

What it should have been called: Word 3.0 for Windows. Simple and accurate.

1995: Microsoft Bob. When I asked my Twitter and Facebook pals to nominate bad Microsoft names, this legendarily lousy Windows front-end hosted by animated characters came up far more often than any other product. It's possible that the badness of the product has tarnished its title. But as several people pointed out, "Microsoft Bob" is both cutesy-cute and uninformative--it doesn't give you an inkling as to what the product is all about. (The box featured a smiley face wearing Bill Gates-like nerdy glasses, but the main character in the interface was a dog named Rover, who was later revived for Windows XP's misbegotten search feature.)

What it should have been called: Well, Microsoft Rover would have been at least slightly more descriptive--especially since the product itself was such a dog.

1996-present: Every name ever associated with handheld devices running Microsoft software. At first, they were called Handheld PCs, and ran an OS known as Windows CE. Then they morphed into Palm PCs--until the PalmPilot people complained, whereupon they became Palm-Size PCs. But only briefly: Soon, Microsoft wanted us to call them Pocket PCs, and the software they ran was renamed Windows Mobile.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Comments (16)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Web 2.0, Among othersBy Anonymous on March 31, 2009, 12:53 pmWeb-based applications have been available and used for years, nearly decades. The label "Web 2.0" irks me to no end as a sloppy, condescending marketing ploy to...

Reply | Read entire comment

Windows XP = ExperienceBy Anonymous on March 31, 2009, 1:01 pmI think XP, VISTA and "7" are all completely stooopid names....they sit around a boardroom and get paid 6 figures to come up with that? I'd call it Beta. Everything...

Reply | Read entire comment

You Forgot to Mention NTBy Anonymous on March 31, 2009, 1:18 pmWhich stood for "New Technology", but in the earlier offerings was called "Not Technology". And who could forget "Windows for Workgroups", which was Windows 3 with...

Reply | Read entire comment

Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Reporting ServicesBy Anonymous on March 31, 2009, 3:45 pmThis product helps you run queries against SQL tables and produce page formated reports. I have to tell people that the information they are looking for is in a...

Reply | Read entire comment

This is tediousBy Anonymous on March 31, 2009, 4:25 pmHandhelds, PDA, etc are not Product names - they're categories... Neither is Hailstorm... Windows 2001, hmm what about Win2k? Apparently you know how NOT to name...

Reply | Read entire comment

Doesn't belong on this list....By Anonymous on March 31, 2009, 8:56 pmBob isn't one of the Worst Names, it was the Gayest name of any product; as anyone that has actually used Bob, It blew.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed