Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

EU fines Intel €1.06 billion in antitrust case

Chip maker ordered to stop illegal practices
By Paul Meller , IDG News Service , 05/13/2009
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

The European Commission Wednesday found Intel guilty of antitrust violations in the market for PC microprocessors and fined it €1.06 billion ($1.44 billion).

Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said that the antitrust action is primarily designed to protect consumers. "Intel has harmed millions of EU consumers," she said, adding that the large fine meted out should "therefore come as no surprise".

The main antitrust abuses involved paying rebates to system manufacturers and to Europe's largest IT retailer, Media Markt, in order to shut out Intel's closest rival, AMD. Although the rebates resulted in a reduction in retail prices, Kroes said that the harm to consumers stems from their not getting the choice of computers that they would have if AMD wasn't suppressed.

The Commission will monitor Intel's compliance with the ruling. Unlike in the Microsoft case, where it appointed a monitoring trustee, the Commission will do the job itself, said officials in the antitrust group.

Intel plans to appeal the ruling and takes "strong exception" to the Commission's decision, Intel President and CEO Paul Otellini said in a statement, saying the decision is "wrong and ignores the reality of a highly competitive microprocessor market."

"There has been absolutely zero harm to consumers," Otellini said.

The €1.06 billion fine is the largest antitrust penalty the Commission has ever levied against a single company. The size of the fine was calculated taking into consideration the duration of the antitrust abuse, the severity of the actions, and any mitigating circumstances the company could offer. Antitrust officials said that there were no mitigating circumstances in this case.

The fine dwarfs that against Microsoft which was fined €497 million for abusing its dominant position in the software market, plus an additional €1.2 billion for failing to respect the antitrust ruling. The Commission also ordered Intel to stop its illegal practices.

The Commission investigation centered around charges that Intel illegally gave rebates to computer manufacturers in return for them buying the bulk of their x86 microprocessors from Intel.

The company was also accused of paying computer makers to cancel or delay the launch of machines using chips made by rival, AMD, and of selling its chips for server computers at below cost to large customers such as governments and universities.

Last year the Commission added fresh charges, accusing the chip giant of paying generous rebates to Media Markt, Europe's biggest chain of IT stores, in return for it de-listing all computers containing AMD chips.

Intel dominates the personal-computer chip market with share estimated at 81.9% at the end of 2008, while AMD held 17.7%, according to IDC.

Europe isn't the only region where Intel has run into trouble with antitrust authorities. In 2005 the company settled with Japan's competition office. Last year it was fined nearly $20 million in South Korea. Meanwhile, the company is under investigation in the U.S. by the Federal Trade Commission.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Partner Content

Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling

Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.

Download whitepaper

Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation

Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.

Download whitepaper

Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video

A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member.  See how in this 2-minute video overview.

Go to video

Comments (11)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Long Over Due!By Anonymous on May 13, 2009, 3:51 pmNuff Said

Reply | Read entire comment

Sad because Intel has better products than AMDBy Anonymous on May 13, 2009, 3:56 pmIntel can beat AMD on merit. The shenanigans at Intel are the fault of a few people at the top. I say jail them, fine them; don't punish the honest, innocent Intel...

Reply | Read entire comment

LOng Over Due! BalderdashBy Anonymous on May 13, 2009, 4:00 pm Amd modernised with 386 and Pentium 4 filing suit for more money and 'free' use of technology while improving the older stuff at lower cost. Rebates was majority...

Reply | Read entire comment

Not In my OpinionBy Wannabetechie on May 13, 2009, 4:03 pmI've found AMD products to be equal to Intel's for a number of years. While both have their individual assets, AMD's have been know for longevity in many systems...

Reply | Read entire comment

Again, Americans Will PayBy DEW on May 13, 2009, 4:35 pmBusiness is a Full Contact competition. If you can’t compete, get out of the business. I find it amazing how EU businesses often slip some silver across several...

Reply | Read entire comment

Intel workers?By Anon on May 13, 2009, 5:03 pmIs Intel going to make its employees pay the fine? Intel must deal with the consequences of its actions.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed