Vendors pitch stripped-down servers to giant Web properties
HP's 'extreme scale-out' architecture signals larger trend
By
Jon Brodkin
,
Network World
, 06/10/2009
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
The explosion of giant Web properties has server vendors building a new kind of machine that is stripped down to the bare
essentials and optimized for cost- and energy-efficiency, analysts say.
The latest entry comes from HP, which on Wednesday introduced a line of x86 servers designed for what HP calls "extreme scale-out" environments. The HP ProLiant SL servers have a layout that lets fans run at lower speeds, and omit features that HP says often aren't required by large Internet
companies, such as redundant power supplies and advanced management software.
But HP is not the pioneer in this scale-out server market, with companies such as IBM, Sun, Dell, Super Micro, and Rackable offering products of their own.
Each vendor has its own approach, but in general these are "systems optimized for large homogenous application scale-out deployments,
an application that spans 1,000 servers," says Forrester Research analyst James Staten. "These are typically things delivered
by Web services, or cloud services as the new buzz term goes."
One key factor is recognizing the server is no longer the point of reliability and availability, Staten says. A software layer
-- such as a virtualization platform -- is needed to ensure the application survives the failure of any particular node, and "the server just needs to
be as cheap and efficient as possible," he says.
HP claims its new products will let customers "cut acquisition costs by 10% and power draw by 28%, while doubling their compute
density." These claims would be hard to verify, because HP has not revealed pricing of the servers.
But customers buying thousands of servers can reasonably expect up-front and operational costs to decline by tens of percentage
points, says Illuminata analyst Jonathan Eunice. Besides improvements in power and cooling efficiency, new servers offered
by HP and rivals "strip down traditional high-availability features and management features to optimize the cost and the supply
chain for massive build-out," Eunice says.
This approach is similar to the thinking behind blade servers, which eliminate various components to save space and power
costs. But these new scale-out servers may be most similar to what Google has built in its own server farms. Google executives
recently explained in a blog post that "we strip down our servers to the bare essentials, so that we're not paying for components that we don't need. For example,
we produce servers without video graphics chips that aren't needed in this environment."
Because hardware is never 100% reliable, "enterprises spend a lot of time and money on maintenance," the Google blog post
continues. "In contrast, we expect the hardware to fail, and design for reliability in the software such that, when the hardware
does fail, customers are just shifted to another server. This allows us to further lower the cost of our servers by using
commodity parts and on-board storage. We also design the systems for easy repair such that, if a part fails, we can quickly
bring the server back into service."
Partner Content
www.bmc.com
Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling
Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.
Download whitepaper
Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation
Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.
Download whitepaper
Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video
A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member. See how in this 2-minute video overview.
Go to video
Comment