- Is the Cisco MARS mission going to abort?
- First iPhone worm spreads Rick Astley wallpaper
- 10 stunning 3D buildings made with Google SketchUp
- Open source software ready for big business
- Four reasons to buy (and one reason to avoid) the Droid
Readers with neck problems are advised to skip this post because it is sure to have your head shaking.
Officials who run the city of Bozeman, Montana -- perhaps setting a new standard for privacy invasion in the name of public safety -- are insisting that job applicants cough up their usernames and passwords for any social networking sites or online forums in which they participate. Reason: background checks.
From a report on Montana's News Station:
"The requirement is included on a waiver statement applicants must sign, giving the City permission to conduct an investigation into the person's 'background, references, character, past employment, education, credit history, criminal or police records.'
"'Please list any and all, current personal or business websites, web pages or memberships on any Internet-based chat rooms, social clubs or forums, to include, but not limited to: Facebook, Google, Yahoo, YouTube.com, MySpace, etc.,' the City form states. There are then three lines where applicants can list the Web sites, their user names and log-in information and their passwords."
Beyond the pale, you say? Not according to Bozeman city attorney Greg Sullivan, who defended the policy after assuring the television station that "the city takes privacy rights very seriously." (Understanding them is another matter.)
"'So, we have positions ranging from fire and police, which require people of high integrity for those positions, all the way down to the lifeguards and the folks that work in city hall here. So we do those types of investigations to make sure the people that we hire have the highest moral character and are a good fit for the City,' Sullivan said."
The good citizens of Montana apparently do not share Sullivan's point of view. An online poll taken by the television station showed 98% of respondents -- 98%! -- believe the policy to be an invasion of privacy, although there is no indication of how many people expressed a view and we all know that online polls are pretty much useless. Nevertheless, you don't see 98% on one of them every day.
Privacy isn't the only issue. As this blog entry on NewWest.net notes, providing your username and password to another person violates the terms of services of some sites. For example, Facebook's ToS reads: "You will not share your password, let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account."
And a comment posted at Boing-Boing raises more legal questions:
"In an interview, they couldn't ask me about my religion, my marital status, my politics, and various other prohibited categories. That's black-letter federal law that every employer knows, especially employers with in-house government-paid lawyers.
"My Facebook page alone has all that information and more, most of it conveniently gathered together in a little box.
"I know the bar for discrimination lawsuits is pretty high, but wouldn't any rejected applicant have a real leg up given that there's no way the city could claim it didn't know it was demanding information it wasn't entitled to know?"
Comments (52)
Want a city job? Fork over your usernames, passwordsBy Paul McNamara on June 18, 2009, 3:00 pmReaders with neck problems are advised to skip this post because it is sure to have your head shaking. Officials who run the city of Bozeman, Montana -- perhaps...
Reply | Read entire comment
Tyranny stinks.By Anon on June 18, 2009, 5:50 pmAre these those continuing freedoms that all the terrorists hate us for?
Reply | Read entire comment
How do they propose to...By Joe on June 18, 2009, 6:07 pmHow do they propose to know that the applicant has provided all the details? Does Bozeman city hall intend to spend even more money wringing out the internet to...
Reply | Read entire comment
A disgraceBy Another Sullivan on June 18, 2009, 6:21 pmGreg Sullivan is a absolute disgrace to his (apparent) Irish heritage. Of course, he is an attorney, which goes a considerable way towards explaining his lack of...
Reply | Read entire comment
Don't Slam AttorneysBy Anon on June 18, 2009, 8:05 pmI am an attorney and agree that this is completely invasive. We do not all "lack ethical nuances" but thank you for stereotyping.
Reply | Read entire comment
I like how "not limited to"By Anon on June 18, 2009, 8:23 pmI like how "not limited to" those sites means it's any internet activity. If this were still the days of AOL you'd have to give up your main account password since...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments