- How to make new stuff from your piles of obsolete tech
- Why your computer sucks
- 10 recession-proof IT skills
- Juniper execs share network vision
- 9-year-old plots his fifth Microsoft certification
Businesses might not want to buy enterprise network gear from bankrupt Nortel, but how about from Bay Networks?
The man running Nortel’s Enterprise Data Solutions division wants to resurrect the Bay Networks name to underscore the pedigree of its corporate infrastructure products.
“The more independently I can run this business and take it back to its roots and make Bay Networks exist again, the more effective and focused we are going to be,” says John McHugh, vice president and general manager of Enterprise Data Solutions. “I would like Nortel to reincarnate Bay Networks.”
View a slideshow of Nortel over the years
The name change is legally possible because Nortel still owns the rights to the Bay Networks trademark by virtue of buying the company in 1998 for $9.1 billion, he says.
Whether that happens relies on the fate of the enterprise division, which could be sold to an existing business or spun off independently. Then it would be up to the new ownership to decide about the name change, McHugh says. “It’s edgy, it’s fraught with some risk, but customers say, I’ve been buying your products since you were Bay Networks,” he says. “If there is a transaction, the future owners should seriously consider that.”
Integration of Bay into Nortel “was not a success,” he says, but either way, he says the most important thing is to highlight the core enterprise gear in its portfolio. Part of the problem Nortel’s Enterprise faces is that its identity has been obscured by the larger Nortel business push into unified communications.
“The parent company doesn’t understand how important data networking equipment is from a customer perspective,” says “There was a higher level strategic goal that we were peripheral participants in. We were a strategic afterthought.”
But if one rumored deal comes through, Avaya might be the buyer, which would create the same problem McHugh sees with Nortel. Avaya’s main message is unified communications, which would subordinate the infrastructure once again. Without having to compete with the marketing din created by other products the enterprise equipment could be better appreciated, he says. “ You have to have an unambiguous statement of intent,” he says.
“Nortel has got to stand toe-to-toe with the networking companies.” He says he is referring to the likes of Cisco and HP, where McHugh worked on the ProCurve line for 10 years. He says that Nortel has a large installed base that is loyal, and he would like to build on that, pushing the enterprise unit’s revenues from $500 million to more than $1 billion in two years.
“Let’s beat Cisco head-to-head in the wiring closet. This is a big installed base with intense loyalty from customers,” he said.
Two factors are freezing Nortel enterprise customers from extending their business with the company, the Chapter 11 bankruptcy and the bad economy that has them delaying spending decisions. “A fair number of my normal customers have the economy or questions about the direction of our business that they’re waiting on.”
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications."' Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (22)
John McHugh can!By Anonymous on July 1, 2009, 7:36 amIf anyone can do it, John can. He has done it with ProCurve with a fraction of the resources and a parent company that is also his competitor.
Reply | Read entire comment
Who care!By Anonymous on July 1, 2009, 8:00 amWhy on earth would anyone care? Nortel bought Bay and truly didn't care about its people or the enterprise business. Nortel instead focused on Optical and Wireless...
Reply | Read entire comment
Who care?? Everyone should care!By Anonymous on July 1, 2009, 9:02 amIt's not that Nortel didn't care when they bought Bay, it's that it didn't understand the competitive nature and the strategic importance of enterprise data and...
Reply | Read entire comment
MPLSBy Anonymous on July 1, 2009, 9:13 amResurecting Bay would be good marketing..BUT!Nortel's largest error was not fully embracing MPLS, and standing in the way of it killed the Bay aquisition, because...
Reply | Read entire comment
MPLS blah, blahBy Anonymous on July 1, 2009, 9:17 amI don't believe Nortel's demise was determined by MPLS. The notion is ridiculous. Poor management and poor execution tanked them. MPLS is just another technology...
Reply | Read entire comment
MPLSBy Anonymous on July 1, 2009, 9:22 amThey probably lost a lot of ground by not having MPLS. They have it now. But MPLS is a royal pain. Take a look at what they're doing with PLSB which is also known...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments