The botnet world is booming
Botnet-directed attacks are increasing
By
Ellen Messmer
,
Network World
, 07/09/2009
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
The thriving world of botnet attacks continues to demand IT's attention.
With U.S. and South Korean government Web sites hit by distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks this week by a botnet
controlled by an unidentified attacker -- North Korea is suspected, however -- the shadowy world of botnets continues to grow
unabated.
According to the ShadowServer Foundation, a group sharing information about botnet activity, the number of identified botnets,
which started to take off about half a dozen years ago, has grown from about 1,500 two years ago to 3,500 today.
So far the botnet-directed attacks against the United States and South Korea, believed carried out through hidden manipulation
of about 50,000 compromised computers using an updated version of an old virus, MyDoom, have done no lasting harm to the many Web sites struck, although the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the Department of
Transportation suffered outages and FTC.gov still is struggling, according to Keynote Systems, which measures and monitors
Web site use. And the DDoS botnet episode is ongoing, with more hits expected on South Korean banks and a newspaper, says
South Korean antivirus firm AhnLab, which analyzed malware samples associated with the attacks.
It's not just DDoS attacks that are associated with botnets. Botnets are usually specialized, designed for criminal tasks
that range from spam distribution; stealing identity credentials such as passwords, bank account data or credit cards and
keylogging; click fraud; and warez (stealing intellectual property or obtaining pirated software).
"There's usually a primary purpose to a botnet," says Jose Nazario, manager of security research at Arbor Networks. "There
are turf wars out there as criminals are vying for the desktop. They try to kick each other off."
Although botnets come and go, the more successful ones have endured for years as large command-and-control systems operated
by shadowy groups that have taken over hundreds of thousands of desktops and sometimes servers.
These botnets are bequeathed names -- usually quirky ones -- by researchers probing them, with the first to identify a new
botnet typically getting to name it.
Gammima (gaming password stealer), Conficker (fake antivirus) and Zeus (information stealer), are among what are believed
to be the largest, according to security firm Damballa.
But sizing botnets up in terms of actual numbers of compromised computers, under their control as bots (sometimes called "drones")
is tough, many experts say.
That's because these numerical counts, typically based on detected numbers of infected machines, are often based on IP addresses
where numbers are influenced up or down by network technologies such as network-address translation. And there's constant
change.
The irony of Conficker, which has infected an estimated 1 million to 10 million machines and has made attempts to sell fake
antivirus to its victims, is that it remains so quiet.
"It's one of the largest botnets out there but currently it's doing nothing," says Nazario, who believes Conficker has infected
about 5 million Windows-based computers.
Comments (3)
Good piece. More attention needs to be shown towards this growing problem...By Anonymous on July 10, 2009, 9:49 amGood piece. More attention needs to be shown towards this growing problem. We're happy to be part of the fight against botnets and click fraud and an ally to merchants...
Reply | Read entire comment
Drive-by Download AttacksBy Eirik on July 10, 2009, 3:59 pmWith all the compromised websites and zero-day attack news lately, I've been asked to discuss drive-by download attacks at customer and sales channel engagements....
Reply | Read entire comment
BotNet HyperboleBy Smithwill on July 13, 2009, 10:10 amThe researchers @ US Cert have long been tracking these activities. The fact that #s continue to rise is evidence that the skill level required to get involved has...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments