Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

The opposite of Twitter: new site requires 1,400-character minimum

By Jon Brodkin, Network World
August 24, 2009 03:09 PM ET
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

For anyone who complains that Twitter posts are too short to be meaningful, we present you with Twitter's exact opposite: Woofer.

While Twitter limits users to 140 characters per tweet, Woofer requires each post to have a minimum of 1,400 characters.

Similar to Twitter, Woofer counts down the amount of characters you have input with a big number at the top right of the screen. But you're not allowed to post anything until you hit 1,400.

Woofer calls itself an homage to Twitter, but to avoid any legal problems makes sure to include statements such as "We are not affiliated in any way whatsoever with Twitter."

Woofer's user interface is near identical to Twitter, however. The service also urges users to tweet about Woofer and for a while Woofer was "borrowing" profile pictures from Twitter users.

Top Twitter tools

Last week, I tried to post a gigantic "woof," by taking the text of a short article about Shaquille O'Neal and using the copy and paste function to get up to about 1.6 million characters.

Here's where it gets a little weird. Woofer asks you to type in your Twitter username. So I typed in my real one (JBrodkin) and my 1.6 million character woof appeared, along with my real profile picture from Twitter.

I immediately wondered: how and why did Woofer post my Twitter picture? I didn't type in any password. But I was signed into Twitter, so perhaps that's why it was able to grab my picture, I reasoned.

To test that theory, I submitted another woof but this time I typed in the username of a different Twitter user, one whom I have never met in person. That person's Twitter profile picture showed up next to the woof, effectively allowing me to impersonate this individual.

Woofer appears to be fixing this problem, though. As of Monday morning, most new posts are now accompanied by a picture of a little blue dog, rather than a real Twitter profile image.

Woofer does require at least some originality. At one point, I tried to woof by typing the letter "d" a bunch of times and then hitting copy and paste over and over again. My attempt failed and I received this message:
"No Woof. Really?! 1400 characters and you can only use d? You can do better than that..."

Woofer obviously isn't meant to challenge Twitter in the microblogging, or "macroblogging" space, to use Woofer's term. The parody Web site is run by Join the Company, a small company in Washington, D.C., which says it specializes in launching "entertaining websites that change the way people use the Internet."

For the most part, it appears "copy and paste" is the preferred method of Woofer users to reach 1,400 words. Some of the first woofs reached the minimum by reciting the opening paragraphs of the Catcher in the Rye, the Gettysburg Address and the Old Testament.

As of Monday, 1,623 users had posted 1,934 woofs --for a whopping total of 38,683,934 characters. If you're wondering, that's about 20,000 characters per woof.

Follow Jon Brodkin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jbrodkin

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Comments (16)
Login
Forgot your account info?

sretqaerfg efgagasdaghndyj rjerasdAWD`4V FVRGQWER AEF dsftg erg h67rjhtytryj By Anonymous on August 25, 2009, 2:46 amsretqaerfg efgagasdaghndyj rjerasdAWD`4V FVRGQWER AEF dsftg erg h67rjhtytryj

Reply | Read entire comment

screenshot of hate speechBy Anonymous on August 25, 2009, 12:38 pmWhile I thought this sounded like a fun spin-off, my first look found this lovely "woof" --see screenshot http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3462/3856600928_f73c7d68c3_o.jpg

Reply | Read entire comment

In other words, you're just blogging?By Anonymous on August 25, 2009, 5:06 pmIn other words, you're just blogging?

Reply | Read entire comment

Woof. But, WHY?By Anonymous on August 25, 2009, 5:45 pmUm, anyone who'd rather just fill a computer screen and indeed an entire Internet with gabage might not want to be MY guest. FTR, those Rest of Us who appreciate...

Reply | Read entire comment

Not a bad ideaBy Anonymous on August 25, 2009, 6:12 pmthinking its to conjure more 'sophisticated' discussion?? why not

Reply | Read entire comment

ConfirmationBy Anonymous on August 25, 2009, 6:28 pmHere's an easy way for woofer to verify that a user is not impersonating.. provide the poster with a more unique short-url which must be tweeted from that user,...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed