- New attack fells Internet Explorer
- Steve Jobs is a man of a few words
- Oddball gifts for uber geeks
- Global warming research exposed after hack
- Google adding IPv6 to YouTube
InTown Suites, a low-cost extended-stay living chain, had a problem with users of file sharing applications who were consuming all of its network bandwidth.
Based in Atlanta, InTown Suites has 139 properties around the country that use T-1 lines to link to a Cisco-powered virtual private network. InTown Suites provides its guests with free high-speed Internet access, but the bandwidth was being gobbled up by users of file sharing applications.
"We were having issues with guests file sharing using applications like BitTorrent and LimeWire," explained Stephen Bell, Director of IT for InTown Suites. "We would have one guest who would be file sharing, and that file sharing application would make so many connections that it would saturate the bandwidth on our T-1 and affect every other guest at that property."
Worse, InTown Suites employees couldn’t access key Web-based applications such as time and attendance and procurement because their T-1 lines were clogged.
InTown Suites tried blocking the IP and MAC addresses for the guests who were engaged in file sharing, but that didn’t work for long.
"Most of these guests were savvy enough that they’d assign themselves another IP address or MAC address from [Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol], so we just went back and forth with the fight," Bell said.
InTown Suites didn’t want to spend money on additional bandwidth because they believed it would just be consumed by the guests who were running file sharing applications. Instead, the company looked for a network appliance that would identify and block the file sharing traffic that was causing trouble.
"These file sharing applications are hard to identify because this particular traffic disguises itself as something else," Bell said. "We needed something that would look at the traffic and identify the traffic for what it really was."
Bell evaluated two devices that could do deep packet inspection: Packeteer (now owned by Blue Coat) and Exinda. Bell said the Exinda device was a better fit for his needs.
"The Packeteer did what it was supposed to do," Bell said. "It allowed us to isolate the office side from the guest side, prioritize the office side and manage the guest side bandwidth so it was more equitable. What it didn’t do was specifically identify packets and block the traffic that we wanted to block. Exinda was a much better solution for our specific problem."
InTown Suites spent around $250,000 to purchase an Exinda device for each of its locations. The company uses these devices to prioritize office traffic and to block peer-to-peer traffic.
Bell said the Exinda devices were simple enough to configure and install that the company could use onsite staff rather than flying IT personnel out to each location for installation.
Bandwidth management boost
Thanks to the improved bandwidth management from the Exinda devices, InTown Suites is putting all of its voice and data traffic on integrated T-1 lines at each of its properties, which are being provided by Qwest.
Comments (29)
T-1By Anonymous on September 24, 2009, 5:54 pmAnyone using T-1 connections to provide Internet access to users doesn't understand what people do on the Internet. A T-1 was considered slow in 2002. Why not...
Reply | Read entire comment
T1?By Anonymous on September 24, 2009, 9:34 pmThey should be fired and network world should be ashamed of such a lame plug. Seriously you can't come up with something better than this? Why do even come to this...
Reply | Read entire comment
if they are using Cisco devices like ISR router, ASA or IPS SensBy Anonymous on September 25, 2009, 7:29 amif they are using Cisco devices like ISR router, ASA or IPS Sensor 6.0 , they can easily block p2p traffic without the need to buying another appliance to do the...
Reply | Read entire comment
false advertisingBy Anonymous on September 25, 2009, 7:45 amThey shouldn't advertise "broadband" or high-speed internet connectivity if they aren't willing to provide it to their customers. Blocking "P2P" is inappropriate....
Reply | Read entire comment
moronBy Anonymous on September 25, 2009, 8:44 amThey don't advertise "UNLIMITED" and when you sign the usage aggreement it states that P2P is not allowed. You sign the aggreement, you live with the consequences,...
Reply | Read entire comment
moron?By Anon on September 25, 2009, 8:59 amyour work traffic should be no more important than his gaming or P2P traffic. they should be treated as equals and as such neither should be able to saturate the...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments