Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Senators want to end telecom immunity for spying program

Four Democratic senators will introduce a bill to repeal lawsuit immunity for telecoms
By Grant Gross , IDG News Service , 09/29/2009
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Four Democratic U.S. senators will introduce a bill to repeal a provision protecting telecommunications carriers from lawsuits targeting their assistance to a controversial U.S. National Security Agency surveillance program.

The new legislation, supported by Senators Chris Dodd of Connecticut, Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Russ Feingold of Wisconsin and Jeff Merkley of Oregon would repeal telecom immunity provisions in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act, passed by Congress in July 2008.

The FISA Amendments Act provides some additional court oversight to the NSA wiretapping program, which former President George Bush's administration launched after terrorist attacks on the U.S. on Sept. 11. 2001. The FISA Amendments Act allowed the so-called Terrorist Surveillance Program, which targets electronic communication of some including phone calls and e-mail, to continue until the end of 2012.

Critics of the NSA program said it illegally targeted U.S. residents' communications with people linked to terrorist groups without court-approved warrants. The program was illegal under the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment, prohibiting unreasonable search and seizure, critics said.

Current U.S. President Barack Obama supported the FISA Amendments Act, including telecom immunity. Telecom immunity provisions were needed to protect companies that helped the U.S. government fight terrorism in a time of need, supporters of the immunity provision said.

The new legislation, called the Retroactive Immunity Repeal Act, would allow lawsuits against telecom providers such as AT&T to resume.

"I believe we best defend America when we also defend its founding principles," Dodd said in a statement. "We make our nation safer when we eliminate the false choice between liberty and security. But by granting retroactive immunity to the telecommunications companies who may have participated in warrantless wiretapping of American citizens, the Congress violated the protection of our citizen's privacy and due process right and we must not allow that to stand."

Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he was pleased to sponsor the bill.

"Last year, I opposed legislation that stripped Americans of their right to seek accountability for the Bush administration's decision to illegally wiretap American citizens without a warrant," he said in a statement. "We can strengthen national security while protecting Americans' privacy and civil liberties. Restoring Americans' access to the courts is the first step toward bringing some measure of accountability for the Bush-Cheney administration's decision to conduct warrantless surveillance in violation of our laws."

The courts, and not the president or Congress, should determine whether the telecom carriers violated the law and rights of U.S. residents, the senators said in a press release.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Partner Content

Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure

Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.

Download the Free Info Kit

Next-Gen Load Balancing

Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.

Download the Free Guide

Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x

Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications."' Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.

Download the Free Guide

Comments (3)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Telecom ImmunityBy Anonymous on September 30, 2009, 8:48 amBetter Late than never! But not much better!

Reply | Read entire comment

So under this logic, a terrorist would just need to make sure anBy Anonymous on September 30, 2009, 10:42 amSo under this logic, a terrorist would just need to make sure an american citizen was in on a coversation and then it would be illegal for law enforcemnt to listen...

Reply | Read entire comment

Flawed LogicBy Anon on October 1, 2009, 8:20 am"So under this logic, a terrorist would just need to make sure an american citizen was in on a coversation and then it would be illegal for law enforcemnt to listen...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed