Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

U.S. House decommissions its last mainframe, saves $730,000

U.S. House of Representatives has taken its last mainframe offline
By Jon Brodkin, Network World
October 09, 2009 04:17 PM ET
  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

The U.S. House of Representatives has taken its last mainframe offline, signaling the end of a computing era in Washington, D.C.

The last mainframe supposedly enjoyed "quasi-celebrity status" within the House data center, having spent 12 years keeping the House's inventory control records and financial management data, among other tasks. But it was time for a change, with the House spending $30,000 a year to power the mainframe and another $700,000 each year for maintenance and support.

How to really bury a mainframe

The cost and energy savings contribute to the Green the Capitol program designed to improve efficiency in the halls of Congress. Applications running on the last mainframe have been moved to x86 and Unix servers, many of which are using virtualization technology that first appeared on the mainframe decades ago. 

"It's a symbolic transition into the latest and greatest in terms of green technology, virtualization, consolidation and all those things," says Jack Nichols, director of enterprise operations at the House of Representatives. "The mainframe plug was pulled, but it was pulled in favor of something that was started in the mainframe world." 

The House had been using mainframes since at least the early 1970s, and at one time had a 13,000-square-foot data center dedicated to mainframe and mainframe operations. As mainframes grew stronger, the House moved down to just one machine, in addition to other types of servers. The last mainframe was an IBM model in place since 1997, and was situated in the Ford House Office Building.

"It wasn't the fastest box in the world," says Rich Zanatta, director of facilities for the House. "Some of our blades and some of our standard servers have more capability than that entire 8-cubic-foot box has. Technology-wise, it's obviously been surpassed."

New mainframes are far more powerful and efficient than those built in the 90s, of course. But the House decided not to buy another mainframe in part because its IT staff has more expertise running x86 and Unix boxes.

"We really don't' have those [mainframe] skill sets in house anymore," Zanatta says. "We try not to maintain architecture that we can't support ourselves."

The staff for House Chief Administrator Officer Daniel Beard held a ceremony to take the mainframe offline Friday. It will be turned over to the U.S. General Services Administration, and could resurface in the used mainframe market. The House also had a second mainframe in a backup site, the location of which is secret, which was also shut off. 

Decommissioning the mainframe involved getting rid of lots of large, bulky cables, not to mention migrating applications to newer systems. The mainframe had been running a half-dozen applications including staff payroll, inventory management, committee calendars and other legislative tasks. But the House staff has been working to move those applications to new servers for the past five years, a process that just ended.

Turning off the mainframe is a big step in reducing the House's server footprint. Already, the House consolidated about 150 test servers down to 20 through virtualization, and consolidated about 120 production servers onto 15 or 20.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Partner Content

Gartner 2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling

Gartner has positioned BMC CONTROL-M in the Leaders Quadrant of their "2009 Magic Quadrant for Job Scheduling." The report assesses the ability to execute and completeness of vision of key vendors in the marketplace. Read a full copy today, courtesy of BMC Software.

Download whitepaper

Dell's SMART Approach to Workload Automation

Read a compelling case study by EMA, Inc. to learn how Dell uses BMC CONTROL-M to cut cost and increase productivity with workload automation.

Download whitepaper

Workload Automation Cost Savings 2 Minute Video

A major computer manufacturer uses BMC CONTROL-M and just four people to schedule and run over 85,000 jobs every month. By switching to BMC CONTROL-M, they more than quadrupled the workload without adding a single staff member.  See how in this 2-minute video overview.

Go to video

Comments (29)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Celebrity StatusBy Anonymous on October 9, 2009, 4:59 pmSounds like we should be asking Mr. Zanatta why the mainframe was kept around if the blades overcame the mainframe. I mean, $730k / yr for celebrity status? I...

Reply | Read entire comment

That's because it takes tonsBy Anon on October 10, 2009, 5:29 amThat's because it takes tons of time and money to migrate data & programs from the mainframe to other platforms. You know, like those 5 full years described in...

Reply | Read entire comment

Watts an hour?By Anonymous on October 10, 2009, 5:52 am'The mainframe was consuming 10,000 to 15,000 watts an hour' You could at least make an effort to get basic physics right. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watt#Confusion_of_watts_and_watt-hours

Reply | Read entire comment

This articel is paid for by...?By Anonymous on October 10, 2009, 7:54 amNone of the arguments except the lack of skills (and that is still questionable) is valid. Either the government has been mislead in its evaluation of the situation...

Reply | Read entire comment

8 Cubic Feet?By Anonymous on October 10, 2009, 8:10 amA cube 2 feet on a side doesn't sound too big for a mainframe.

Reply | Read entire comment

They probably meant 8 feet on a side.By Anonymous on October 10, 2009, 8:48 amThey probably meant 8 feet on a side.

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed