Italian gov't backs down slightly over Web regulation bill
Commentators welcome changes to Italian Internet law
By Philip Willan, IDG News Service
February 08, 2010 01:51 PM ET
Observers and operators gave a cautious welcome Monday to proposed changes to a draft Italian broadcasting law that has been
criticized as a menace to freedom of expression on the Internet.The draft decree was approved last Thursday by lawmakers on
committees in the Senate and Chamber of Deputies (upper and lower houses of parliament) but with a request for sweeping changes,
particularly in the section governing the Internet, which had aroused widespread condemnation.Deputy Communications Minister
Paolo Romani, who was responsible for promoting the decree, said the government would "take rigorous account" of the lawmakers'
suggestions. "Given the differences in the texts approved by the Chamber and the Senate it is clear that we will have to find
a way of harmonizing them," Romani said.Lawmakers said there would be no Web censorship under the new rules. "Blogs with amateur
videos, online newspapers, search engines and the online versions of magazines are free, and editorial responsibility does
not fall on providers who host content generated by others," Alessio Butti, the government lawmaker who drew up the text approved
by the Senate committee, told reporters."The Chamber and Senate Commissions have proposed significant and positive changes
to the draft broadcasting law," Marco Pancini, senior European public policy counsel for Google Italy, said in a prepared
statement Monday.Google's YouTube subsidiary is being sued by Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's Mediaset broadcasting company
for alleged copyright violation for allowing users to post videos taken from the company's three national TV networks. Under
the original draft of the broadcasting law, which the government says enacts a European Union directive, YouTube risked being
treated as a conventional television broadcaster, requiring a special license from the government and assuming editorial responsibility
for all material uploaded to its Web site."It is premature to give a definitive verdict. The text still needs to be finalized
and the government still needs to accept the amendments," Pancini's statement said.Paolo Nuti, president of the Association
of Italian Internet Providers (AIIP), said he welcomed the change of heart expressed by the parliamentary committees but pointed
out that their recommendations were not binding on the government."What counts is the text that comes out from the government.
There is just one problem: that the recommendations of the European Union directive on electronic commerce are incorporated
into Italian law. If I don't have that written down in black and white I can't be satisfied," Nuti said in a telephone interview."My
impression is that the government realized its text went well beyond the terms of the EU directive. Certainly the parliamentary
committees have realized that."Bloggers were also quick to welcome the government's apparent U-turn. "This is a new U-turn
made necessary by the incompetence of the geriatric ward that, unfortunately for us, on both sides of the political spectrum,
occupies Italy's seats of power," said Andrea Guida, writing on the blog geekissimo. "It seems that asking that a law on a delicate subject like the Web be written by someone aged under 60 is asking too much."The
government's initial attempt to tighten control of the Internet was also decried by Nicola D'Angelo, a commissioner in the
Communications Authority, which is likely to be given a role in policing Internet video content under the new law."Personally
I am opposed to sheriffs of the Web," D'Angelo said in an interview published Saturday by the Turin daily La Stampa. "There
is a general tendency to try to exercise greater control over Internet. That is particularly grave in a country like ours
where other forms of communication already show signs of a heavy concentration."Much of that concentration is in the hands
of Silvio Berlusconi, whose family owns newspapers, magazines, book publishers and three national TV networks, and who exercises
indirect control of the state broadcaster RAI through parliament.It will be reassuring for Berlusconi to know that one of
the people responsible for rewriting the law in the Chamber of Deputies committee is Deborah Bergamini, a member of his People
of Freedom Party and his former personal assistant. Bergamini was briefly suspended from her duties as a director of marketing
when she worked previously for RAI over allegations that she maintained telephone contact with colleagues at Mediaset to coordinate
coverage of major news events.
To continue reading, register here and become an Insider. You'll get free access to premium content from CIO, Computerworld, CSO, InfoWorld, and Network World. See more Insider content or sign in.
Observers and operators gave a cautious welcome Monday to proposed changes to a draft Italian broadcasting law that has been
criticized as a menace to freedom of expression on the Internet.The draft decree was approved last Thursday by lawmakers on
committees in the Senate and Chamber of Deputies (upper and lower houses of parliament) but with a request for sweeping changes,
particularly in the section governing the Internet, which had aroused widespread condemnation.Deputy Communications Minister
Paolo Romani, who was responsible for promoting the decree, said the government would "take rigorous account" of the lawmakers'
suggestions. "Given the differences in the texts approved by the Chamber and the Senate it is clear that we will have to find
a way of harmonizing them," Romani said.Lawmakers said there would be no Web censorship under the new rules. "Blogs with amateur
videos, online newspapers, search engines and the online versions of magazines are free, and editorial responsibility does
not fall on providers who host content generated by others," Alessio Butti, the government lawmaker who drew up the text approved
by the Senate committee, told reporters."The Chamber and Senate Commissions have proposed significant and positive changes
to the draft broadcasting law," Marco Pancini, senior European public policy counsel for Google Italy, said in a prepared
statement Monday.Google's YouTube subsidiary is being sued by Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's Mediaset broadcasting company
for alleged copyright violation for allowing users to post videos taken from the company's three national TV networks. Under
the original draft of the broadcasting law, which the government says enacts a European Union directive, YouTube risked being
treated as a conventional television broadcaster, requiring a special license from the government and assuming editorial responsibility
for all material uploaded to its Web site."It is premature to give a definitive verdict. The text still needs to be finalized
and the government still needs to accept the amendments," Pancini's statement said.Paolo Nuti, president of the Association
of Italian Internet Providers (AIIP), said he welcomed the change of heart expressed by the parliamentary committees but pointed
out that their recommendations were not binding on the government."What counts is the text that comes out from the government.
There is just one problem: that the recommendations of the European Union directive on electronic commerce are incorporated
into Italian law. If I don't have that written down in black and white I can't be satisfied," Nuti said in a telephone interview."My
impression is that the government realized its text went well beyond the terms of the EU directive. Certainly the parliamentary
committees have realized that."Bloggers were also quick to welcome the government's apparent U-turn. "This is a new U-turn
made necessary by the incompetence of the geriatric ward that, unfortunately for us, on both sides of the political spectrum,
occupies Italy's seats of power," said Andrea Guida, writing on the blog geekissimo. "It seems that asking that a law on a delicate subject like the Web be written by someone aged under 60 is asking too much."The
government's initial attempt to tighten control of the Internet was also decried by Nicola D'Angelo, a commissioner in the
Communications Authority, which is likely to be given a role in policing Internet video content under the new law."Personally
I am opposed to sheriffs of the Web," D'Angelo said in an interview published Saturday by the Turin daily La Stampa. "There
is a general tendency to try to exercise greater control over Internet. That is particularly grave in a country like ours
where other forms of communication already show signs of a heavy concentration."Much of that concentration is in the hands
of Silvio Berlusconi, whose family owns newspapers, magazines, book publishers and three national TV networks, and who exercises
indirect control of the state broadcaster RAI through parliament.It will be reassuring for Berlusconi to know that one of
the people responsible for rewriting the law in the Chamber of Deputies committee is Deborah Bergamini, a member of his People
of Freedom Party and his former personal assistant. Bergamini was briefly suspended from her duties as a director of marketing
when she worked previously for RAI over allegations that she maintained telephone contact with colleagues at Mediaset to coordinate
coverage of major news events.
The IDG News Service is a Network World affiliate.