Skip Links

Printer Makers Clash Over Advertising Claims

HP is challenging Kodak’s promises that consumers can save money by purchasing a Kodak printer. Who should you believe?

By Jeff Bertolucci, PC World
February 22, 2010 10:51 AM ET
  • Print

For nearly two years, Kodak has promised consumers that they can save big bucks by switching to Kodak all-in-one inkjet printers. Unsurprisingly, the company has encountered some opposition. HP is the most recent competitor to challenge Kodak's claim that consumers can "save on average $110 per year on ink" by buying a Kodak printer.

According to HP and an independent consulting firm, consumers would have to print four pages per day to save that much money with a Kodak printer--far more than most home users actually do. Last year HP lodged a grievance against the Kodak ads. In December, the Federal Trade Commission ruled that Kodak could continue the advertising campaign if it slightly changed the wording. As a result, Kodak's revised ad copy now reads: "Save on average $110 per year on ink based on just four pages per day."

Ads Still Misleading?

Even with the tweaked text, however, Kodak's claims are still beguiling to consumers--according to HP, at least. "The average user in the United States prints about half of what Kodak is using as the basis for their cost-savings claim," says Andy Binder, HP Inkjet & Web Solutions marketing director.

But how do we know whether HP is telling the truth? For one thing, HP is basing its assertion on studies conducted by Lyra Research, a respected consulting firm in the printing industry. According to Lyra senior analyst Andrew Lippman, Kodak's cost-savings claims are far-fetched.

In fact, few consumers would ever achieve the promised cost savings. "You have to be printing 1500 pages per year--well above average for most people--to get the $110 savings that Kodak claims," Lippman says.

Kodak points out that its revised ads are essentially the same these days, albeit with a minor rewrite. "It's not anything different than consumers have always heard for the last three years," says Paula Balik, worldwide communications line manager for Kodak inkjets. The only FTC-mandated change that Kodak had to make, Balik says, was to move "four pages per day," previously buried in the ads' footnotes, closer to the headline.

Quality, Cost Concerns

According to Senior Editor Melissa Riofrio, who oversees printer testing for PCWorld, Kodak's inks may be cheaper than those of competitors, but the print quality on plain paper is not as good. On photo paper, the quality is excellent, but the money you save on ink is eaten up by the cost of photo paper.

As for the printers themselves, HP was at the bottom of the list among printer makers in our 2010 Reliability and Service survey; Kodak finished slightly higher. We asked our readers, among other questions, whether their printer had problems upon arrival, how satisfied they were overall with the device's reliability, and how well the company solved any problems that cropped up. Kodak printer owners said that they had good experiences with the company's tech support, but they gave the printers poor marks for reliability. HP received five below-average ratings--two in reliability, three in service categories.

  • Print

Originally published on www.pcworld.com. Click here to read the original story.

Videos

rssRss Feed