I knew my story about the Lower Merion School District spying on its students via their webcams would get a rise out of the Cringeville population, and I wasn't disappointed. Since I posted the piece, however, there have been a few new developments.
For one, Harriton High assistant principal Lindy Matsko has issued an emphatic and emotional denial, declaring media reports that she spied on students "unjust and inaccurate":
At no point in time did I have the ability to access any Web cam through security tracking software. At no time have I ever monitored a student via a laptop web cam, nor have I ever authorized the monitoring of a student via security tracking web cam, either at school or within the home. And I never would.
[ Want to cash in on your IT experiences? InfoWorld is looking for stories of an amazing or amusing IT adventure, lesson learned, or war tale from the trenches. Send your story to offtherecord@infoworld.com. If we publish it, we'll keep you anonymous and send you a $50 American Express gift cheque. ]
She adds that she's never disciplined a student for actions outside of school that were not related to school activities. You can listen to her full six-minute statement at KYW Newsradio's Web site.
The problem? According to the lawsuit at the heart of this case, Matsko allegedly showed Harriton High sophomore Blake Robbins a picture somebody else allegedly snapped of him using his laptop's webcam. That's something she never actually denies doing (possibly on advice of her lawyers).
Fact is, though, if there's anyone at fault here, it isn't Matsko -- it's the IT geeks who implemented this "laptop tracking" technology and the school administrators who approved its use.
Outrageous as it seems, this practice does not seem to be that unusual. First there's that school in the Bronx that uses Webcams to remotely watch students in classrooms video, which was featured in an NPR Frontline documentary, "Digital Nation." It's pretty damned creepy.
Then I got an email from a reader, a former school systems engineer who goes by "anonymous" (no, not that Anonymous), who says his former employer -- a district outside Richmond, Va. -- has done the very thing Lower Merion school officials have admitted to doing, and for the same reasons. His take on it is somewhat chilling.
In the first year of the laptop program, the laptops were running Mac OS 9 which had a remote control program called ARD. Principals, the technology department, etc used ARD to push software to the laptops, and also to monitor what students were doing. I know firsthand that many students had figured out how to run ARD on their own to remote control other students' laptops.
[The district] upgraded to OSX several years ago. With the latest laptops that have been issued to the middle school students, the administrators, technology department, etc have the ability to use the built-in cameras by remote control exactly as was done at Lower Merion...
According to the Richmond Times-Dispatch, the school district has activated its webcams 50 times in the past three years to locate laptops stolen from elementary schools, and recovered 20 of them. One big difference, though: Unlike in the Lower Merion case, these computers were not supposed to go home with students. That's really where those guys crossed the line. It's one thing to watch kids on school grounds, quite another to snoop on them at home (see creepy, damned, above).
Originally published on www.infoworld.com. Click here to read the original story.