Skip Links

Clearwire takes different stance on net neutrality

While other wireless carriers oppose, WiMAX wholesaler takes more open approach

By Brad Reed, Network World
April 28, 2010 05:24 PM ET
  • Print

While most wireless carriers have fiercely opposed the imposition of network neutrality standards on wireless data networks, WiMAX wholesaler Clearwire is taking a decidedly different approach.

Clearwire exec shares WiMAX roadmap

Clearwire’s take on net neutrality was on full display during the Federal Communications Commission’s workshop on “preserving the open Internet” held today in Seattle, WA. After T-Mobile CTO Cole Brodman outlined his company’s case against implementing net neutrality rules on wireless networks, Clearwire CCO Mike Sievert said that it would be foolish for wireless carriers to discriminate against different kinds of content and applications that their customers wanted to access.

“If you were told by your wireline provider that there are applications that you can’t run on their network, I don’t think customers would tolerate it,” said Sievert. “We don’t want to impose any restrictions on our own customers that we wouldn’t tolerate from our wireline service.”

Net neutrality refers to the principle that ISPs should not be allowed to block or degrade Internet traffic from their competitors in order to speed up their own. The push for net neutrality began in 2005, when incumbent telecom carriers successfully lobbied the FCC to repeal common carrier rules that required the incumbents to allow ISPs such as EarthLink to buy space on their broadband networks at discount rates.

Sievert explained today that Clearwire is more open to net neutrality principles than other wireless carriers because it already has an IP-based mobile broadband network that isn’t as vulnerable to capacity crunches as today’s 3G cellular networks are.

“We’re a different kind of company in this space,” he said. “Unlike other companies in this space, we don’t have a need to jealously guard our legacy cellular networks.”

Most wireless companies cheered last month when the DC Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the Federal Communications Commission’s authority to impose network neutrality rules on ISPs under its current regulatory framework. Essentially, the court said that the FCC would either have to reclassify ISPs as common carriers or ask Congress to give it explicit permission to enforce net neutrality on carriers. Wireless companies have been particularly opposed to net neutrality, as they say they need to take a strong hand in managing their networks in order to keep them running properly.

Sievert said that while he was sympathetic to carriers’ need to manage their cellular networks, they would be able to use a lighter touch on network management in the future when they get their 4G networks up and running. Sievert predicted that once more carriers attained true broadband capacity on their wireless networks, they would become less likely to block certain applications that consume large amounts of bandwidth.

But while Sievert endorses net neutrality in principle, he said he had no problem with a tiered pricing system when it comes to individual bandwidth consumption. Sievert explained that Clearwire has plans that offer varying amounts of bandwidth consumption for users per month and that users can pay higher prices for unlimited bandwidth usage or lower prices if they want to save money because they don’t use all that much bandwidth per month.

  • Print
What is Tech Briefcase?
TechBriefcase is a new, free service where IT Professionals can Search, Store and Share IT white papers and content like this. Learn more
Bookmark content
Speed up your research efforts with content across the web.
Search and Store
Find the white papers you need. Create folders for any topic.
View Anywhere
Open your briefcase on your iPhone, tablet or desktop. Share with colleagues.
Don't have an account yet?

Videos

rssRss Feed