- 10 Hot Big Data Startups to Watch
- 11 Unique Uses for Google Glass, Demonstrated by Celebs
- How to Export Your Google Reader Account
- How to Better Engage Millennials (and Why They Aren't Really so Different)
IDG News Service - The U.S. Federal Communications Commission took a major step Tuesday toward ending subsidies for traditional telephone service in rural areas and redirecting the money to broadband deployment.
The FCC's proposal to overhaul its Universal Service Fund (USF) could eventually lead to new fees for broadband users, with the agency potentially shifting fees now paid by long-distance voice customers. But the FCC's notice of proposed rulemaking, unanimously approved by commissioners, doesn't tackle the issue of how to support the fund. Proposals on the fee structure are likely in the coming months, FCC staffers said.
The FCC proposal would make major changes to USF, a 14-year-old program that many critics have called outdated and wasteful. The proposal, for which the FCC will seek public comments early this year, would phase out subsidies for rural telephone service in the USF's US$4.3-billion-a-year high-cost fund, with funding redirected to help deploy broadband to the estimated 24 million U.S. residents who don't have wired or wireless service.
U.S. lawmakers and some FCC members have been calling for changes to USF for years, saying its focus on traditional telephone service is outdated. In addition, USF is inefficient, because it pays for as many as four telecom carriers to provide service to some areas, and it pays up to $20,000 a year to support single telephone lines in some cases, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said.
"The Universal Service Fund is broken," Genachowski said during Tuesday's FCC meeting.
The proposal would cap subsidies for a single phone line in the continental U.S. at $3,000, and it would end funding for multiple carriers to provide voice service in the same area. The agency would use cost savings from those reforms and other efforts to start a Connect America Fund focused on subsidizing broadband service to areas that don't now have it.
In addition, the proposal looks for ways to control the growth of the USF, which includes programs for subsidizing telephone service for poor people and connecting schools and libraries to the Internet, as well as the high-cost fund. USF's annual budget has grown from $4.9 billion in 2000 to $8 billion now, said Robert McDowell, a Republican member of the FCC.
USF is funded through a fee of more than 15 percent on long-distance telephone bills, but many U.S. voice customers are abandoning traditional long-distance service for mobile phones or VoIP (voice over Internet Protocol). The growth in USF is "simply unsustainable," McDowell said.
McDowell complained that the Democratic majority's proposal doesn't include plans to revamp the fee structure for USF. "While not ideal, in my view, piecemeal reform is better than no reform at all," he said.
It doesn't make sense for traditional telephone customers to pay the entire cost of USF when the fund is shifting to broadband, added Michael Copps, a Democratic member of the FCC.
"Recognizing that consumers ultimately bear the burden, equity would suggest that a fund that distributes support for broadband ought to require those same services to contribute," Copps said. The high-cost fund's current budget is "unlikely to be the total bill for bringing total, high-speed telecommunications to every citizen in every corner of the land," he added.