Skip Links

Microsoft: We make more money on cloud-based Exchange than legacy email

Per-user income greater in cloud, or so Microsoft claims

By , Network World
August 10, 2011 02:20 PM ET

Network World - Microsoft claims it earns more money per user from cloud-based Exchange email accounts than it does selling the legacy version of Exchange Server most businesses deploy today.

That's what Microsoft investor relations GM Bill Koefoed said at the Oppenheimer Annual Technology, Media & Telecommunications Conference Tuesday, according to a transcript on Microsoft's website. Customers who purchase Exchange as part of the Office 365 cloud service pay roughly $10 per month, less than they would in the back-end costs of running their own Exchange servers, but nearly all of of it goes directly to Microsoft, he said.

Hosted productivity suites: Google Apps or Microsoft Office 365?

That doesn't mean Microsoft actually makes more money in the cloud than it does with its traditional business of selling software licenses. For one thing, Microsoft's cloud customer base is mostly small businesses. To gain the kind of per-user profits Koefoed is talking about, Microsoft needs Office 365 to lure in big enterprises.

"Within an enterprise, let's say it costs $15 per user per month today to run Exchange, and that's about $2 for Microsoft, and that's $13 in rent, power, the data base administrator that's running the thing, the hardware and all the kind of services that are associated with kind of running Exchange in your premise," Koefoed said.

"With Office 365, or with Exchange Online, the Exchange part of that, we charge $10 per user per month," he continued. "So, that ends up being a savings to the CIO of roughly 33%, and we make 5X more revenue and our profit ends up being somewhere, $3 or $4 per user per month. So, we make more revenue and we make more profit and we save our customers money."

The profit ends up being $3 or $4 per user per month because it costs Microsoft $6 or $7 per user to run the data centers powering the cloud service. "We can do that at scale," Koefoed noted. "Interestingly, one of the things that we've learned in our search business is how to run data centers at scale."

Koefoed gave the example in response to investors' questions about how Microsoft's revenue in the cloud compares to its traditional business model of selling software licenses. The popularity of Google Apps with small businesses is among the factors that forced Microsoft to expand its Web-based offerings, but investors are likely concerned these offerings will cannibalize Microsoft's existing revenue streams.

Koefoed's example leaves out the fact that Office 365 is appealing mostly to smaller businesses with few users. The small business version of Office 365, which includes Exchange, SharePoint, Lync and Office Web Apps, costs only $6 per user per month. An actual Exchange Server license, meanwhile, costs $700 for a standard edition and $4,000 for an enterprise edition, plus extra charges for client access licenses.

Enterprises can lessen the financial hit because of their scale, making the economics of running their own servers worthwhile for the customer, which is why Koefoed can say enterprises pay Microsoft only $2 per user per month to run Exchange. For small customers, the per-user cost of running Exchange Server without a cloud subscription would be higher, and therefore more profitable for Microsoft. Whether Microsoft actually makes more per-user profit from cloud services than packaged software is therefore questionable.

Our Commenting Policies
Cloud computing disrupts the vendor landscape

 

Latest News
rssRss Feed
View more Latest News