Skip Links

Huawei: House Intelligence Committee report is 'not fact-based'

Says report's finding that Huawei is a security threat is based on 'rumors and speculations to prove non-existent accusations'

Huawei statement regarding HPSCI's report

Network World - "The United States is a country ruled by law, where all charges and allegations should be based on solid evidence and facts. The report conducted by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (the Committee), which took 11 months to complete, failed to provide clear information or evidence to substantiate the legitimacy of the Committee's concerns."

BACKGROUND: House Intelligence Committee report blasts Huawei, ZTE as threats to U.S. national security

RELATED: Cisco said to cut ties to ZTE

Bullet Cisco said to cut ties to ZTE
Bullet House Intelligence Committee report blasts Huawei, ZTE as threats to U.S. national security
Bullet '60 Minutes' torpedoes Huawei in less than 15 minutes
Bullet Politics, not security, at center of Huawei, ZTE allegations, say analysts
Bullet Joint ventures by U.S. tech firms with China pose cyberwar risk: report


"We had hoped to ensure that the investigation would be fact-based and objective in its review of our business activities and the global issue of cyber-security. Over the past 11 months, Huawei has cooperated with the Committee in an open and transparent manner, and engaged in good faith interaction: our top management team carried out multiple rounds of face-to-face communication with the Committee members in Washington D.C., Hong Kong, and Shenzhen; we opened our R&D area, training center, and manufacturing center to the Committee and offered a wealth of documentation, including the list of members of the Board of Directors and the Supervisory Board over the past 10 years, and the annual sales data since our establishment in 1987; we also made the list of our shareholding employees, the shares they hold, as well as information about our funding resources and financial operations available to the Committee. We adopted a transparent approach in providing this information to ensure the results are fact-based and unbiased, hoping the Committee's objective review of our business activities and the global cyber security issue can clarify the misperception of Huawei. 

"However, despite our best effort, the Committee appears to have been committed to a predetermined outcome. 

"The ranking member of the Committee stated at the hearing that the investigation by the committee 'is not political jousting or trade protectionism masquerading as national security'. Unfortunately, the Committee's report not only ignored our proven track record of network security in the United States and globally, but also paid no attention to the large amount of facts that we have provided. Even before the investigation began, the Chairman of the committee advocated to media that 'I stand by my caution to the American business community about engaging Huawei technology until we can fully determine their motives'. 

"The report released by the Committee today employs many rumors and speculations to prove non-existent accusations. This report does not address the challenges faced by the ICT industry. Almost every ICT firm is conducting R&D, software coding and production activities globally; they share the same supply chain, and the challenges on network security is beyond a company or a country. The Committee's report completely ignored this fact. We have to suspect that the only purpose of such a report is to impede competition and obstruct Chinese ICT companies from entering the US market. 

Our Commenting Policies
Latest News
rssRss Feed
View more Latest News