- 15 Non-Certified IT Skills Growing in Demand
- How 19 Tech Titans Target Healthcare
- Twitter Suffering From Growing Pains (and Facebook Comparisons)
- Agile Comes to Data Integration
Computerworld - The U.S. House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday voted 18-2 in favor of a controversial information-sharing bill that was reintroduced in Congress this February after failing last year amid widespread protests from rights group and a White House veto threat.
The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) next goes to the full House for a vote, possibly as soon as next week.
Wednesday's vote came after a closed meeting of the House committee and is almost guaranteed to spark the same kinds of protests that it evoked the last time. Many have already blasted the Committee's decision to close today's meeting off to the public.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) accused the bill's sponsors of hiding behind closed doors to push the controversial legislation.
"Public accountability is paramount with cybersecurity," said Jeramie Scott, national security fellow at EPIC before the vote was taken. "The House Intelligence Committee is trying to avoid public scrutiny. EPIC would like to see the process opened up to the public, robust privacy protections added, and Presidential Decision Directives on cybersecurity released to the public," Scott said.
CISPA is designed to bolster national cybersecurity by enabling companies and federal agencies to share threat information with others more freely and without fear of legal or liability issues. Supporters of the measure, which include the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, nearly every major Internet service provider, and scores of technology companies, say that such threat-information sharing is vital to improving security.
Bill opponents, such as EPIC, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and others, including notably Facebook and Reddit, say the bill is too vaguely worded and would give the government broad access to private information on Internet users.
The bill passed the House last year but failed to gain traction in the Senate after strong opposition from privacy groups and President Obama, who threatened to veto it.
When Obama issued a cybersecurity executive order earlier this year containing some of the same information-sharing provisions that CISPA did, some had hoped the bill would die a quiet death. But in February, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-MI) and ranking member C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.) reintroduced CISPA with many of the same provisions that scuttled it the last time.
Jaikumar Vijayan covers data security and privacy issues, financial services security and e-voting for Computerworld. Follow Jaikumar on Twitter at @jaivijayan or subscribe to Jaikumar's RSS feed. His e-mail address is email@example.com.
Read more about cyberwarfare in Computerworld's Cyberwarfare Topic Center.
Originally published on www.computerworld.com. Click here to read the original story.