- Steve Jobs is a man of a few words
- Internet routing blasts into space
- 15 free downloads to pep up your old PC
- IBM smartphone software translates 11 languages
- New attack fells Internet Explorer
Despite the myriad of media types available for 10G Ethernet networking, the technology is too expensive for many corporations to realize its performance benefits. That's why the IEEE developed 10GBase-CX4, a lower-cost switch interface.
The 802.3ak task force formed in 2002 to quickly create a standard for 10G Ethernet that operates on twin-axial cable assemblies of up to 50 feet. With Gigabit Ethernet rapidly moving to the desktop, a higher-speed fat pipe would be needed between desktop switches and distribution switches to combine traffic in much the way that Gigabit Ethernet had done for 10/100M bit/sec networks.
When using Gigabit links for stacking Gigabit switches, the typical throughput is well below the aggregate bandwidth of the switches and therefore performance is limited. With 10GBase-CX4, performance can be scaled to take advantage of this faster pipe. In addition to responding to the broad demand for high-speed interconnects within wiring closets, 10GBase-CX4 also can be used in data centers to aggregate servers.
Range is not critical for this application because most switches reside in a wiring closet. But cost is paramount, as the uplinks are often integrated directly into desktop switches and the cost of the uplinks is amortized into the per-port cost of the switch.
Approved in February, 802.3ak is economical because it reuses portions of 802.3 and other standards to simplify and lower the cost of implementation. For example, 802.3ak specifies the same type of connectors and cables now used with 4X InfiniBand, letting vendors incorporate 10GBase-CX4 capability directly within highly integrated chips. It also minimizes design, installation and maintenance costs by preserving 802.3 network architecture, management and software features. As a result, the IEEE expects installation costs for copper 10GBase-CX4 interconnections to be one-tenth that of comparable 10GBase-optical solutions.
10GBase-CX4 uses the XAUI (10 Gigabit Attachment Unit Interface) specified in 802.3ae, and the 4X connector that's used for InfiniBand.
Rather than attempt to transmit 10 gigabits over a single copper link, the 802.3ak specification uses four transmitters and four receivers operating differentially over a bundle of very thin twin-axial cables to transmit 2.5G bit/sec each at a baud rate of 3.125 GHz per channel with 8B10B coding. This requires four differential pairs in each direction for a total of eight twin-axial channels per assembly.
Pre-emphasis and receiver equalization are used to boost the signal energy to compensate for loss at high frequencies. Pre-emphasis is a technique whereby the high-frequency content of a transmitted signal is boosted or low-frequency content is attenuated to compensate for high-frequency loss in cable assembly. Receiver equalization is a similar process applied at the receiver. Using pre-emphasis reduces the dynamic-range requirements on the receiver equalizer and makes it easier to implement in standard silicon.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications."' Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (2)
regarding the cost of etherenet installationBy Anonymous on July 15, 2009, 1:26 amThe analysis is not quantified. it woul rather have been beeter to provide with exact figures.
Reply | Read entire comment
regarding the cost of etherenet installationBy Anonymous on July 15, 2009, 1:26 amThe analysis is not quantified. it woul rather have been better to provide with exact figures.
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments