- Securing SSLVPN with client certificates
- Toshiba propels DVD quality to near HD
- 16 hot roles for IT pros
- Torvalds: Fed up with the 'security circus'
- The dos and don'ts of IT job seeking
News | Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Most vendors are not out to get your budget dollars any way they can, with complete disregard to delivering value. And customers should not view vendor interactions as adversarial. Too often, the approach to managing vendors can be one of distrust, aggressive negotiation, and sharing minimal information beyond required specifications. This is no way to get the best out of vendors.
In a recent article titled, "When Tech Spending Slows Down, Hug Your Vendor" , the suggested "hug" is to squeeze vendors on price when they are having financial issues and are more likely to take any deals to make sales. This advice shows just how adversarial vendor relationships can become. Some vendor behavior certainly warrants this attitude. When customers get locked in to a specific proprietary software suite or a specific hardware standard across their organization, they can have significant switching costs. Some vendors have taken advantage of these situations, putting customers on the defensive. A vendor-win, customer-lose experience can put the customer on track to look for a time when the tables are turned and they can take advantage of the vendor, creating a customer-win, vendor-lose retort.
As CEO of a software company selling to law enforcement and public safety, I saw one of the most critical examples of poor vendor/client relationships. The level of distrust of vendors was palpable at trade shows and in the language of RFPs. Years of apparent abuse by vendors surrounding proprietary data formats and other tactics designed to raise switching costs led to aggressive pricing. This was complicated by the fact that most law enforcement agencies are relatively small, local organizations with limited technical expertise. The situation had gotten so bad that many vendors realized it had gone too far and were working to make things better. However, the customers were so entrenched in the win-lose behaviors, that real changes by the vendors were not having an effect on client behavior. Ultimately, the Department of Justice established a vendor/client organization, the IJIS Institute (Integrated Justice Information Systems Institute) to bring vendors and client organizations to the table to plan for open standards and improvement in vendor-client relationships. The situation is improving slowly as a result of these efforts along with an increasing technical sophistication on the client side.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comment