Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
/

Dress for success - reprise

Related linksToday's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback

Sign up to receive this and other networking newsletters in your inbox.

As might be expected from the readers of a technically oriented magazine, our newsletter about dress generated some lively feedback.

A couple of people seem to be surprised that there is anything left to debate about dress codes and that an otherwise professionally written magazine would even put such obscene terms as "blue suit" and "white shirt" in print. They say that they get paid for what they do, not how they look. One reader comments very correctly that "most companies have abandoned the suit and tie standards, and business casual is now the accepted dress for almost all offices."

Our specific recommendation was to "understand the rules and standards [as related to dress] of your environment and dress a little on the conservative side." That seems to resonate with a lot of people; in fact, the majority of our readers who responded are solidly in favor of adopting a personal conservative dress standard. One reader pragmatically remarks, "I look at it like this - I work hard to be successful and to project an image of success. Looking right is the easy part."

Several people suggest that I should have at least touched on dressing for an interview. One of the reasons I chose to revisit the subject this week is that every comment we received from someone who is in the hiring loop for their company indicated that it is still extremely important to dress well for an interview. It may not be necessary to don "traditional" interview attire; however, it is necessary to dress professionally (for men this could mean dispensing with the standard blue suit, white shirt and burgundy tie and instead wearing a blazer, solid shirt and matching tie). Readers candidly remarked that they have seen cases where candidates were removed from the running for a job simply because they didn't dress professionally for the interview.

There is general agreement, as well, that the employer and the employee should simply use common sense in this area. Casual dress for many jobs is fine. One reader sums it up very well: "Image is important. I believe that we should take personal responsibility to at least make sure that our image doesn't detract from the rest of the professional package that we present to the world."

RELATED LINKS

Amy Schurr is an editor for Network World's Management Strategies and Features sections. If you have any career topics you'd like her to cover or want to comment on this newsletter, you can reach her at aschurr@nww.com.

Careers index
Past newsletters.

Newsletter: Interviewing tips
Network World Fusion Focus, 02/01/99.

Newsletter: Ace that first interview
Network World Fusion Focus, 5/29/98.

Find a job! Check out our career listings

Discuss your career goals with the Career Doctor Shaun Kelly

Archive of Network World on Careers newsletters


NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.
* HOME    * RESEARCH CENTERS     * NEWS     * EVENTS

Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy | How to Advertise
Reprints and links | Partnerships | Subscribe to NW
About Network World, Inc.

Copyright, 1994-2006 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved.