- How to use electrical outlets and cheap lasers to steal data
- The botnet world is booming
- NTIA seeks volunteers to review broadband applications
- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- What's driving this university to IPv6? Going green
Steve Taylor and Larry Hettick offer news and analysis on the latest in IP convergence from fixed-mobile convergence, presence management, IP video and unified communications.
This week, we'll finish up the mini-series covering IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) progress with a re-cap on the issues and our analysis. We began the series with a hypothesis suggesting that "on paper," IMS is a great idea. But our bias before interviewing the experts who are working to advance IMS was that actual deployments are rolling along very slowly due to many factors, including the need for more multivendor interoperability testing of SIP (Sessions Initiation Protocol), the lack of IMS "hooks" for carrier operational support systems (OSS), and our belief that tension between wireless and wireline service network operations was a possible source of delays.
Countering our pre-disposition to the need for more proven multivendor SIP interoperability, Randy Waters at Comverse said that in Europe, his company has tested a wide range of SIP-based voice features within multivendor IMS core networks supporting residential VoIP, IP Centrex, and push-to-talk over cellular - along with messaging application testing (to a lesser extent) than the voice features.
Adding support to Water’s observations, Manish Mangal and Mike Logan of Sprint said that the carrier has worked with multiple vendors to solve some of the interoperability issues for SIP, and they have had “some good agreement on voice and voice extensions;” however “for other services like presence, video, and policies, the standard isn’t that mature and as these [other] services go, there is a lot of work to be done.”
So, testing our hypothesis about the need for more SIP interoperability, it seems that while voice features are pretty well supported, the industry still needs more work before IMS can support other multimedia services beyond voice.
Next time, we’ll look at our second and third hypotheses.
For readers who want to go back and look at the interviews we completed for this series, please click on the links here for
views from:
* Ajay Gupta at Aricent
* Manish Mangal and Mike Logan at Sprint
* David Withington at Alcatel Lucent
* Randy Waters at Comverse
* Siroos Afshar at AT&T
* Bill Goodman at Verizon
Our thanks to these experts who helped clarify the issues and progress surrounding IMS.
Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Larry Hettick is a principal analyst at Current Analysis.
Comments (1)
RE: Why IP Multimedia Subsystems are not ready for services beyond voiceBy rvodden on January 17, 2008, 4:58 amInterestingly the BBC in partnership with their technology supplier Siemens have implemented an Anevia solution to provide access to channel content and studio output...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments