- Nokia's new N97 vs. the iPhone
- 10 Microsoft research projects
- Hard to get justice in MySpace case
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- Apple removes antivirus support page
Steve Taylor and Larry Hettick offer news and analysis on the latest in IP convergence from fixed-mobile convergence, presence management, IP video and unified communications.
Following our recent newsletter on the need for session border controllers (SBC) capability with VoIP and unified communications applications, we heard back from Matt Edic, director, Enterprise Sales and Product Management at NextPoint Networks. NextPoint is the result of a merger between NexTone Communications, a software-centric SBC and session management provider, and Reef Point Systems, a mobile access universal convergence gateway provider. Edic concurred with our opinion that where an SBC resides is not an issue but that an SBC is necessary for VoIP and unified communications solutions that extend to other locations and connect to other networks.
Edic also shared this opinion: “What is perhaps most critical is the availability of a 'back-to-back' user agent . . . [because by] providing necessary security and interoperability functionality for unified communications applications, an SBC must also be able to apply intelligence within a session path.” Consequently, he concludes that: “An SBC must be able to accept and hold an incoming session to the network; initiate an outgoing session; and bridge the two sessions. This requires that sophisticated intelligence or logic – session routing and dynamic policy control – be inserted within the session path for processing and interconnection.”
Edic also noted: “In an enterprise unified communications environment, this also means that the SBC must support both H.323
as well as SIP-based IP PBXs.” He correctly observes that: “In the past 10 years, VoIP/IP PBX deployments within enterprises
have been H.323-based primarily (counting SCCP [Skinny Client Control Protocol] as a derivative) and only recently has SIP
been more fully deployed within enterprises.”
He said that at NextPoint, “to keep up with our evolving customer demands, we find a software-based approach gives us both
the flexibility to adapt to their application-specific requirements and the ability to leverage different performance and
platform characteristics.”
Our thanks to Edic for his observations and feedback. If you’d like share your thoughts (either agreeing or disagreeing), please feel free to contact us via e-mail or through the public comment section below, and we’ll be happy to share your reaction with other readers.
Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Larry Hettick is a principal analyst at Current Analysis.
Partner Content
The Foundry Enterprise Advantage
Foundry Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: FDRY) is a leading provider of high-performance enterprise and service provider switching, routing, security and Web traffic management solutions. Foundry's customers include the world's premier ISPs, metro service providers, and enterprises.
For further information on Foundry Networks please click here.
Leveraging the Advantages
of a Multi-vendor Network Strategy
Today's enterprise network provides more than simply a technology infrastructure. It's an enabler for the enterprise, supporting mission critical applications, creating operational efficiencies and increasing productivity gains. Foundry Networks provides the ideal foundation for a multi-vendor network.
Click here to view whitepaper!
Comment