Session border controls necessary to extend VoIP to connect to other networks
Views of SBC and VoIP from NextPoint Networks
Convergence & VoIP Alert
By
Steve Taylor
and
Larry Hettick
,
Network World
, 02/27/2008
Sign up for this newsletter now!
Steve Taylor and Larry Hettick offer news and analysis on the latest in IP convergence from fixed-mobile convergence, presence management, IP video and unified communications.
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
Following our recent newsletter on the need for session border controllers (SBC) capability with VoIP and unified communications applications, we heard back
from Matt Edic, director, Enterprise Sales and Product Management at NextPoint Networks. NextPoint is the result of a merger
between NexTone Communications, a software-centric SBC and session management provider, and Reef Point Systems, a mobile access
universal convergence gateway provider. Edic concurred with our opinion that where an SBC resides is not an issue but that
an SBC is necessary for VoIP and unified communications solutions that extend to other locations and connect to other networks.
Edic also shared this opinion: “What is perhaps most critical is the availability of a 'back-to-back' user agent . . . [because
by] providing necessary security and interoperability functionality for unified communications applications, an SBC must also
be able to apply intelligence within a session path.” Consequently, he concludes that: “An SBC must be able to accept and
hold an incoming session to the network; initiate an outgoing session; and bridge the two sessions. This requires that sophisticated
intelligence or logic – session routing and dynamic policy control – be inserted within the session path for processing and
interconnection.”
Edic also noted: “In an enterprise unified communications environment, this also means that the SBC must support both H.323
as well as SIP-based IP PBXs.” He correctly observes that: “In the past 10 years, VoIP/IP PBX deployments within enterprises
have been H.323-based primarily (counting SCCP [Skinny Client Control Protocol] as a derivative) and only recently has SIP
been more fully deployed within enterprises.”
He said that at NextPoint, “to keep up with our evolving customer demands, we find a software-based approach gives us both
the flexibility to adapt to their application-specific requirements and the ability to leverage different performance and
platform characteristics.”
Our thanks to Edic for his observations and feedback. If you’d like share your thoughts (either agreeing or disagreeing),
please feel free to contact us via e-mail or through the public comment section below, and we’ll be happy to share your reaction
with other readers.
Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Larry Hettick is a principal analyst at Current Analysis.
Comment