Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Session border controls necessary to extend VoIP to connect to other networks

Views of SBC and VoIP from NextPoint Networks
Convergence & VoIP Alert By Steve Taylor and Larry Hettick , Network World , 02/27/2008
Steve Taylor
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Steve Taylor and Larry Hettick offer news and analysis on the latest in IP convergence from fixed-mobile convergence, presence management, IP video and unified communications.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

Following our recent newsletter on the need for session border controllers (SBC) capability with VoIP and unified communications applications, we heard back from Matt Edic, director, Enterprise Sales and Product Management at NextPoint Networks. NextPoint is the result of a merger between NexTone Communications, a software-centric SBC and session management provider, and Reef Point Systems, a mobile access universal convergence gateway provider. Edic concurred with our opinion that where an SBC resides is not an issue but that an SBC is necessary for VoIP and unified communications solutions that extend to other locations and connect to other networks.

Edic also shared this opinion: “What is perhaps most critical is the availability of a 'back-to-back' user agent . . . [because by] providing necessary security and interoperability functionality for unified communications applications, an SBC must also be able to apply intelligence within a session path.” Consequently, he concludes that: “An SBC must be able to accept and hold an incoming session to the network; initiate an outgoing session; and bridge the two sessions. This requires that sophisticated intelligence or logic – session routing and dynamic policy control – be inserted within the session path for processing and interconnection.”

Edic also noted: “In an enterprise unified communications environment, this also means that the SBC must support both H.323 as well as SIP-based IP PBXs.” He correctly observes that: “In the past 10 years, VoIP/IP PBX deployments within enterprises have been H.323-based primarily (counting SCCP [Skinny Client Control Protocol] as a derivative) and only recently has SIP been more fully deployed within enterprises.”

He said that at NextPoint, “to keep up with our evolving customer demands, we find a software-based approach gives us both the flexibility to adapt to their application-specific requirements and the ability to leverage different performance and platform characteristics.”

Our thanks to Edic for his observations and feedback. If you’d like share your thoughts (either agreeing or disagreeing), please feel free to contact us via e-mail or through the public comment section below, and we’ll be happy to share your reaction with other readers.

Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Larry Hettick is a principal analyst at Current Analysis.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content
Foundry Networks

The Foundry Enterprise Advantage

Foundry Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ: FDRY) is a leading provider of high-performance enterprise and service provider switching, routing, security and Web traffic management solutions. Foundry's customers include the world's premier ISPs, metro service providers, and enterprises.

For further information on Foundry Networks please click here.

Leveraging the Advantages
of a Multi-vendor Network Strategy

Today's enterprise network provides more than simply a technology infrastructure. It's an enabler for the enterprise, supporting mission critical applications, creating operational efficiencies and increasing productivity gains. Foundry Networks provides the ideal foundation for a multi-vendor network.

Click here to view whitepaper!

Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed