- FTC targets prerecorded telemarketing drivel
- 16 hot roles for IT pros
- Securing SSLVPN with client certificates
- 13 desktop-virtualization tools
- 10 must-have virtualization tools
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:App Performance | On Demand Security | Networking Solution | SOA | Value of WDS
Land went fast in parts of the Pacific Northwest a short time back. Big companies like Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft bought territory near abundant sources of hydroelectric power in the hope of both guaranteeing, and controlling the cost of, electrical power for their data centers. The fact that this is a region not prone to large-scale natural disasters like hurricanes is a bonus. Presumably, on other continents and in other parts of North America, other companies are making similar acquisitions for similar reasons.
Data center placement has become a much more complex endeavor in the last few years, thanks to the convergence of two factors: the growth in demand from super-dense, super-hot data centers, which we have explored extensively here, and the loss of trust in the power grid.
Data center architects don’t and shouldn’t trust the U.S. power grid in the same way previous generations of designers could and did. There are many reasons not to. Supply is having trouble keeping up with demand in several important regions – in New York and California, for example – leading to rolling brownouts and even blackouts in peak load periods. The power infrastructure is aging and so failing to become significantly more efficient. Key components in the power generation and distribution grid are attractive targets for disgruntled fanatics of many stripes. Natural disasters and climatic change are putting strains on it, whether in the form of outright destruction as in Hurricane Katrina, or in the slow push-over–the-edge of longer than usual heat waves causing not spikes but unsustainable plateaus of energy consumption for cooling.
The banks of the Columbia River beckoned as one potential solution to the problem for Google et al, and other hydro sites will too, but large enterprises, governments, and data center companies should not limit themselves to looking for help from flowing water only. Especially if oil prices stay high, other options will become steadily more attractive too.
Consider, for example, the possibilities of wind turbines in north central states like Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota, where a stable mixture of coal, oil, gas, and nuclear plants is being supplemented gradually with wind power. The local flavors of disaster are floods – easily avoided – and tornadoes, the dangers of which can be minimized by underground construction. As an added bonus, for several months in the year, waste heat from a data center can be used to heat offices or nearby buildings!
Partner Content
Explore the Ultrium Edge
The powerful tape technology can address data security with tape encryption as well as long term data protection.
Find out more
Disk and Tape Square Off
Discover what disk and tape really cost -- and which solution provides lower total cost of ownership and optimizes energy use for your organization
Download the White Paper
Don't Fall For The Myths
The Clipper Group explores the truth behind the myths of tape, digging into the misconceptions in the disk vs. tape debate.
Download the White Paper
Will You Add Tape Too?
Over two thirds of disk-only users look to add tape back into storage infrastructure according to recent survey.
Download Survey Information
Comments (1)
Dammed spotsBy Anonymous on June 19, 2007, 8:53 amAfter living in the Pacific Northwest area (which is wonderful!), I find the article misleading. To quote the article "The fact that this is a region not prone...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments