Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

How a universal directory might work

A worldwide, distributed, replicated virtualized directory system would be useful for provisioning across boundaries
Security: Identity Management Alert By Dave Kearns , Network World , 03/04/2009
Kearns
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Dave Kearns provides the information you need to evaluate, install and maintain your corporate identity management system.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Provisioning across organizational boundaries using either traditional technologies or those associated with federation has been our subject the past few issues. In the last newsletter, the subject of a universal directory was mentioned. Today let's see how that might work.

Traditional provisioning techniques rely on a centralized data store of identity information, either a core directory service used as a metadirectory or a virtualized directory system. There's no reason why a worldwide, distributed, replicated virtualized directory system shouldn't be useful for provisioning across boundaries.

We noted a few weeks ago the adoption of the Identity Governance Framework (IGF) as a way for applications and identity stores to talk to each other. It’s a good starting point for identifying a schema for the worldwide directory service (WWDS). The folks who originally developed the IGF at Oracle could tweak it with the help of their friends in the virtual directory department (formerly OctetString) so that it was easier to work with.

As much as I’d like to, though, I can’t recommend Oracle provide the base directory service - that’s too much control in one company’s hands and would make it more difficult for others (IBM, Sun, Microsoft, et al) to adopt the scheme.

Instead, I’d suggest that Radiant Logic’s RadiantOne server & Context server make the ideal candidate to provide the WWDS. The added bonus of the Context server allows every organization to see the WWDS as a part of it’s tree which should mean that most current LDAP tools would continue to work as described, a major plus when seeking adoption of new technology.

This would take some work, but it would also solve a number of problems, federated/external provisioning being only one of them. I’d sure like to see someone step up and take the lead.

Dave Kearns is a consultant and editor of IdM, the Journal of Identity Management.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (2)
Login
Forgot your account info?

The church of X.500...By Anonymous on March 4, 2009, 10:47 amDave, posted a response to your article here: http://jacksonshaw.blogspot.com/2009/03/please-please-stop-bus.html Best, Jackson

Reply | Read entire comment

From Static Directories to Context ServersBy Anonymous on March 6, 2009, 7:09 pmThanks, Dave, for the kind words about Radiant Logic, and for raising the topic of a "universal directory." This is an important and complex subject, one that's...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed