- New attack fells Internet Explorer
- Steve Jobs is a man of a few words
- Oddball gifts for uber geeks
- Global warming research exposed after hack
- Google adding IPv6 to YouTube
Dave Kearns provides the information you need to evaluate, install and maintain your corporate identity management system.
When a company makes a big mistake I'll call them out on it. And when a company recognizes a mistake and corrects it, I'll give them a big pat on the back. Novell gets a pat on the back today. First, though, there's a bit of a mistake I made that I need to correct.
Omada product manager Bo Abildgren caught me out in the newsletter about Microsoft's Forefront: Identity Manager ("Microsoft to release identity product") a couple of weeks ago. Evidently I had trouble reading my own notes, or perhaps it was the in-line skaters marathon going on outside my hotel room that caused a brain freeze. Either way, I said, "Also, Microsoft finally has a product that can successfully manage SharePoint," when what I really meant was that the FIM Portal is built on SharePoint -- but there's no management utility built in. Omada is working on a Sharepoint governance product for FIM 2010. We'll bring you more about that in an upcoming issue.
Back to Novell, though. I said in the last issue that Senior Vice President of Marketing John Dragoon announced a new policy -- a maintenance contract would be required as of early November to access previously free service packs and patches for most Novell products. And, in early 2010, Novell would extend this requirement to include Technical Information Documents (TIDs) in the Novell Support Knowledgebase. I wasn't able to speak to Dragoon until after we had gone to press, but we did note that Novell had rescinded the need to buy maintenance in order to access the Knowledgebase.
When I did speak to Dragoon, he added that the effective date of requiring maintenance for access to patches was also being pushed back into the new year.
Both of these decisions should be applauded. Novell did listen to its customers and channel partners and did do the right thing. No matter what the reasoning was, it admitted to making a mistake and corrected it. That deserves a kudo or two.
What I couldn't get Dragoon to admit to is that sometimes there are patches to fix problems in a product. He seemed to think that most were for additional functionality. But I'm sure his perception can be changed if enough customers and partners tell him about the problems that they've fixed with patches. And now there's more time to do so.
Upcoming Events – from IdM Journal's Events Calendar:
Nov. 3 - 5: Internet Identity Workshop, Mountain View, Calif.
Nov. 3 - 5: ID World, Milan
Nov. 3: Identity Management 2009, London
Dave Kearns is a consultant and editor of IdM, the Journal of Identity Management.
Comments (8)
Sounds like they still don't want your business...By Anonymous on October 2, 2009, 4:16 pmAnd novell wonders why they have trouble with market share-
Reply | Read entire comment
Novell clarification and your follow-up is goodBy twessels on October 2, 2009, 7:03 pmI'm glad Dave was able to move beyond his original post and get the whole story regarding Novell's abortive attempt to restructure their product maintenance subscription...
Reply | Read entire comment
Novell gaffeBy Anonymous on October 3, 2009, 7:19 pmMr. Dragoon must be a newbie. ;-)
Reply | Read entire comment
Not my jobBy Anonymous on October 4, 2009, 11:28 amI do not need to waste my time to convince a vendor to "do the right thing". I'm not going to provide a bunch of evidence to support my decision. I'm just going...
Reply | Read entire comment
InterestingBy Anonymous on October 5, 2009, 1:54 pmAbout 3 years ago, I sat and talked with Mr. Dragoon about this and other things, including Microsoft's Small Business Server. His reaction was, "I can't compete...
Reply | Read entire comment
Novell has never "gotten" itBy MLaw on October 5, 2009, 3:51 pmFrom the days of dealing with Ray Norda, Eric Schmidt, Mr. Stone, etc. with all of them saying approximately, 'yes, we get it, we have to do a better job of understanding...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments