- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
Microsoft is tackling certification exam cheating in a big way, with harsher penalties and a data forensics program that can find cheaters through statistical analysis of their exams.
Lifetime bans from Microsoft’s certification program will be handed down to anyone who cheats, commits fraud, or violates the non-disclosure agreements (NDA) that are designed to prevent test questions from being leaked to the public.
Under a soon-to-be released policy revision, “if you commit fraud, break the NDA, break any of our policies, it’s going to result in a lifetime ban from the Microsoft certification program,” says Peggy Crowley, the anti-piracy program manager for the Microsoft Learning department. “We used to have a year-long ban for some things and a lifetime ban for other things, and then we decided that cheating is cheating across the board, and why delineate between the two? So we decided to do a lifetime ban for all forms of cheating.”
Cheating takes many forms. Some cert candidates use old-fashioned crib sheets, while others communicate with fellow test-takers via text messaging, Crowley said. Bringing a phone into a testing center can result in a lifetime ban.
While test-takers face lifetime bans, test centers suspended for fraud are allowed to seek reinstatement after three years at the discretion of Microsoft, and if reinstated must agree to an enhanced security plan.
Crowley discussed the anti-piracy program during a Microsoft Webcast on June 25 titled Redmond CSI: Anti-Piracy and Microsoft Certification.
“There will always be cheating as long as there are tests,” Crowley noted. But Microsoft is using some high-tech methods to catch cheaters. The newest method is a data forensics program that identifies patterns indicative of cheating and piracy. Unusual response times or “aberrant” responses can indicate fraud, Crowley says. “Any time you take a test you leave data behind,” Crowley says.
Microsoft has long used statistical analysis in the course of fraud investigations. The difference now is Microsoft will launch enforcement actions based solely on statistical findings. Microsoft Learning feels comfortable taking this step because of new analyses that show the data forensics are so accurate there is a mere one-in-a-trillion chance of a false positive, Crowley says.
Comments (20)
Then Microsoft shold Level the Playing fieldBy Anonymous on July 9, 2008, 1:40 pmI Think the biggest reason for braindump sites is because we have to try and guess which answer is microsoft correct. Stop with all answers could be correct and...
Reply | Read entire comment
I have to agree about the "playing field"By Anonymous on July 9, 2008, 10:57 amI have taken -- and passed -- several Microsoft exams in numerous subjects. I have also developed training courses, seminars [and tests!] for many technologies over...
Reply | Read entire comment
value of ms certificationBy Anonymous on July 9, 2008, 10:31 pmI think the value of the ms certification is very dubious. Not only do I question the way the test 9mult choice) but the resource materials are very poor quality....
Reply | Read entire comment
Cheating is cool...as long as there's more MCSEs...By Schratboy on July 11, 2008, 12:35 pmIronic...NOW they crack down on certs! Personally, I've seen raft-loads of certs after people's names that effectively mean nothing, especially when I, without...
Reply | Read entire comment
Cheaper wayBy Anonymous on July 11, 2008, 4:24 pmWhat are they going to do about training. I have worked for many companies and the same thing comes up all the time. "We want certs but we are not going to send...
Reply | Read entire comment
Easy way to stop most exam cheatersBy Anonymous on July 14, 2008, 8:38 pmI have always believed a quick and simple method to stop braindump forms of cheating is to create a large question pool. With a small pool of questions a cheater...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments