Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

The return to mainframe computing?

Not quite
Wide Area Networking Alert By Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler , Network World , 05/24/2007
Steve Taylor
Sign up for this newsletter now!

WAN experts Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler analyze and share best practices on WAN issues from optimization to management.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

Jim recently moderated a seminar series on the topic of network and application optimization that was produced by Network World. This is the second of three newsletters that will discuss some of the questions that the audience had for the vendors that presented that the seminars.

Jim was surprised that one of the issues raised by the audience in each city was the return to the mainframe. For example, one attendee asked, “Isn’t the long term direction to move back to mainframe computing thereby eliminating WAN issues and most of us?” Another asked, “Would you say that with the implementation of VMware and virtualized data centers that we are going back to the days when we had only a mainframe?”

These questions seem to imply that we somehow have stopped using mainframes. The reality is that while mainframes are not as prevalent as they once were, we never stopped using mainframes. Many industries such as banking rely heavily today on mainframe computers.

That being said, there are indeed strong parallels between the IBM mainframes of the 1970s and 1980s and today’s virtualized data centers. In particular, the IBM mainframes of 20 years ago had powerful operating systems that supported virtualized processing and virtualized storage over the computer’s backplane. Given that architecture, it is reasonable to compare an IBM mainframe of that period with a contemporary data center that supports virtualized storage and processing over high-speed LANs and storage-area networks.

However, the phrase mainframe computing implies more than just the existence of a mainframe. That phrase also implies the type of desktop device and the types of applications that are run and the WAN connectivity. In the 1970s mainframe computing model the desktop device was a relatively dumb 3270 terminal. These terminals processed a standard set of applications that required virtually no bandwidth. In particular, the typical WAN of that timeframe was a 9600 baud, multi-point private line. Put another way, nobody ever sent a 10MB PowerPoint presentation over one of these networks.

In the current era of mainframe (or virtualized data center) computing, the desktop device can be a desktop computer, a laptop, or a wide range of PDAs or smart phones. These devices process a huge range of applications, some of which are provided by the company, and some of which are not. The WAN throughput requirements of these applications range from miniscule to monumental. The WAN itself is a combination of wired and wireless connectivity at speeds that typically range from sub-T-1 to OC-12. The movement to a service-oriented architecture with Web services drives one more distinction between 1970s mainframe computing and today’s mainframe computing. In the 1970s version of mainframe computing, the entire application resided on a single mainframe. In an SOA model, the application is comprised of multiple Web services that typically reside in different data centers.

Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Jim Metzler is vice president of Ashton, Metzler & Associates.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure

Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.

Download the Free Info Kit

Next-Gen Load Balancing

Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.

Download the Free Guide

Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x

Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.

Download the Free Guide

Comments (4)
Login
Forgot your account info?

3270 terminals not quite so "dumb"By kupjones on May 25, 2007, 2:38 pmAgreed, the 3270 terminal prootcols looked alot like the early days of the Mosaic webbrowser capability - I know because I was there -- looking at the spec for the...

Reply | Read entire comment

dumb terminal????By Anonymous on May 25, 2007, 9:27 amAnyone who thinks that the 3270 was a *dumb* terminal knows SQUAT about the mainframe. The 3270 series terminals were intelligent devices which were an integral...

Reply | Read entire comment

Glass House Environment-Return?By Fritz Ruben on May 25, 2007, 1:15 amWho ever wrote this article either wasn't there in the 80's or doesn't know what they are talking about. He speaks of no connectivity between between desktops or...

Reply | Read entire comment

Why we're moving back to the glass-house modelBy Anonymous on May 24, 2007, 9:52 amThe authors miss the point of the question posed. The question isn't "Are we going back to the traditional model?" The question is: "Are we moving back to the...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed