Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

Foundry, Cisco, Juniper, Citrix challenged to a face-off, Part 2

Application delivery challenge focuses on product differentiation
Wide Area Networking Alert By Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler , Network World , 08/16/2007
Steve Taylor
Sign up for this newsletter now!

WAN experts Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler analyze and share best practices on WAN issues from optimization to management.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

As mentioned in the prior newsletter, Layland Consulting and Webtorials have produced the 2007 Application Delivery Challenge, featuring products from Foundry, Cisco, Juniper and Citrix.

As a part of the challenge, it is assumed that there are certain “table stakes” capabilities that must be delivered. In particular, one assumes that, as mentioned in the introduction of the challenge:

* “The application owners want high availability. When one of their servers goes down they want the application switch to seamlessly move the traffic to the other servers.”

* “The end users just want the application switch to make their application appear as if it is always there. When their server goes down, they don’t want to know about it, they expect the application switch to quickly and seamlessly move them to another one.”

* “Security people want to know that no one, except themselves and maybe a select few, can access and configure the application switch. Since it plays a critical role in directing application traffic, any solution needs to be hardened against hackers.”

* “The people who maintain the building would for once like something that does not turn the building into a sauna.”

* And, needless to say, there’s an even longer wish list from the networking crowd.

As a part of delivering on this set of needs, the resulting products each have, as a minimum, according to Robin Layland, “server and appliance load balancing, server and appliance awareness, server off-loading, security, and application acceleration.” Of course, the level of acceleration is somewhat limited because, as mentioned in the prior newsletter, these appliances are asymmetrical products that are placed in the data center as opposed to symmetrical products designed primarily for acceleration.

As Robin points out, the focus here is on what makes each product “better” as opposed to a generic “application delivery appliances are good” marketing pitch. He states: “I did not ask [the vendors] to spend time talking about common features. If they don’t spend time on a capability or feature that I mentioned above that doesn’t mean they don’t have it. Rather, it just means that they do not think it is the capability that differentiates them from the others in the challenge.”

The written portion of the challenge is available now at Webtorials. This will be followed in a few weeks by a series of on-demand Webtorials in which Robin interviews each of the participating vendors.

Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Jim Metzler is vice president of Ashton, Metzler & Associates.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure

Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.

Download the Free Info Kit

Next-Gen Load Balancing

Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.

Download the Free Guide

Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x

Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.

Download the Free Guide

Comments (2)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Missing vendorsBy Luis on August 21, 2007, 7:49 amI totally agree with the previous comment. Without F5 and RADWARE this test is not complete.

Reply | Read entire comment

RE: Foundry, Cisco, Juniper, Citrix challenged to a face-off, Part 2By Anonymous on August 16, 2007, 10:33 amother than Citrix, you have a set of irrelevant vendors participating in this study. Where are F5, Crescendo, Radware, vendors that deliver that vast majority of...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed
Get instant email notification when white papers, webcasts, executive guides are added to our library. Stay informed and up-to-date with the latest on IT Technologies with Network World's Resource Alerts.
Network World,to go. Wherever you are. Breaking news delivered to your mobile device. Select the hottest topics in networking and start receiving Network World on your mobile device today.