- 4chan hell raisers finding fame brings heat?
- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- NetApp quits bidding war in face of EMC opposition
- CompuServe closes after 30 years
- Google to launch open-source Chrome OS this year
WAN experts Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler analyze and share best practices on WAN issues from optimization to management.
If the reaction to the discussion back in October on whether application optimization should be integrated into the router is any indication, our point-counterpoint discussions can generate some heated debate. While there were no comments that reached SNL's "Jane, you ignorant slut," countered with "Dan, you pompous ass," we did get some comments that got both technical and passionate. Today, we're raising yet another perennial question: Is it better to have a homogeneous network for consistency, or does a heterogeneous network where the customer chooses what they believe to be "best of breed" in each respect provide the best overall reliability?
In a recent paper posted at Webtorials, Cisco advocated the use of a single network vendor to provide high reliability for the entire network. Cisco has especially
focused on increasing reliability and thereby reducing risk by using a single network vendor.
We’re starting the point-counterpoint discussion this week with comments from Ben Goldman, Cisco director of marketing, network
systems, who addresses the positive side of making this move.
He writes: “With the emergence of Web 2.0 applications, enterprise accounts are looking more and more toward ways that they can optimize their networks to deliver business-critical functions their users and customers require. Simultaneously, as the network becomes the platform for service delivery, these same enterprises are recognizing the business imperative of maximizing network availability. With the onslaught of worms, viruses, spyware, and other malware attacks on the network and its resources – not to mention buggy software and all too frequent security alerts – CIOs are starting to link up with the risk management office to employ risk mitigation techniques into their network designs.
“In this environment, a single vendor network design not only allows for the enterprise to leverage the network more effectively by maximizing availability and reduce operational expenses, but also provides the foundation for innovation adoption that is critical for addressing the Web 2.0 challenges. We will examine the four major reasons why a single vendor integrated network is the optimal approach to minimizing risk while maximizing network availability and service delivery.
Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Jim Metzler is vice president of Ashton, Metzler & Associates.
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Free Guide: “Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today’s Network Traffic” shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Free Guide: “The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications.” Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: “Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today’s Network Traffic” shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: “The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications.” Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (21)
Just a thought,By Shbeeb on December 3, 2007, 3:40 amWhat are the pros and cons of having a single vendor, forget how the vendor is, and let's look at the bigger picture, depending on your business and IT needs, what...
Reply | Read entire comment
I prefer best of breedBy Tarek on November 30, 2007, 1:30 amIt seems that Mr. Goldman is missing a very important point here. It's Standards! He said, "complexity of varied implementations of protocols and features with...
Reply | Read entire comment
Depends on Your Politics....By michaeljmorris on November 29, 2007, 11:17 amActually, my blog about single vendor solutions does not mean Cisco is the only choice for the single vendor...the point was to use only a single vendor in your...
Reply | Read entire comment
Part 2By Adam Gaffin on November 29, 2007, 10:48 amDiscuss part 2: Selecting a single-source vendor.
Reply | Read entire comment
Three things you can'tBy Anonymous on November 29, 2007, 9:45 amThree things you can't discuss at the dinner table: 1. Politics 2. Religion 3. Cisco with Mike Morris Every time Cisco blows in your ear do you thank them...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments