- Nokia's new N97 vs. the iPhone
- 10 Microsoft research projects
- Hard to get justice in MySpace case
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- Apple removes antivirus support page
WAN experts Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler analyze and share best practices on WAN issues from optimization to management.
In the past couple of newsletters, we've been celebrating the 25th anniversary of TCP/IP, and, as such, we've been taking a look back at the path that TCP/IP has taken over the past quarter century. In response to the first newsletter in the series, Vint Cerf pointed out that there was a long development cycle for both TCP/IP and for X.25.
Vint wrote: “Keep in mind that TCP/IP development began in 1973. X.25 started almost concurrently. Larry Roberts was running Telenet at the time and when he asked me what protocol to use for his service I recommended TCP/IP, but he rejected this on the grounds that he could not sell a datagram service. He thought he could only sell ‘virtual circuits’ to replace real circuits at a lower price. (Based on statistical multiplexing, you could offer the same burst rate service at a lower price because the statistical sharing allows more users on the same capacity.) Ultimately, we just ran TCP/IP over X.25, ATM, Frame Relay, MPLS, PON, etc etc. That was the whole point of the design of TCP/IP.”
Thanks to Vint, first of all, for pointing out that there was a long development cycle for both TCP/IP and for X.25. And Steve takes two lashes with a wet bit pipe for not mentioning this, since he, being in a research setting at the time, has been using TCP/IP-based e-mail for more than 25 years.
Vint also brings up an excellent point in terms of marketability vs. technology. Over the years, we can come up with many examples both of where the best technology did (or did not) win and of how marketing has defined a service.
For example, many of the “best” features of frame relay, such as the ability to use Switched Virtual Circuits (SVC) in addition to Permanent Virtual Circuits (PVC) were never widely marketed because the pricing was too complex. Rather, the PVC was a simple replacement for a leased line at a fraction of the cost with better performance. This pricing model, for which we’ll give primary credit to Christine Heckart, was carried forward to ATM, and helped define roughly 10 years of “state-of-the-art” networking.
Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Jim Metzler is vice president of Ashton, Metzler & Associates.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (4)
Who's Vint Cerf? I thought it was Al Gore.By Anonymous on February 1, 2008, 1:14 pmVint Cerf? DARPA? Are these folks trying to steal Al Gores invention? If it wasn't for Al Gore, there'd be no Internet and the world would be on fire due to Global...
Reply | Read entire comment
why TCP/IP was so long in comingBy Anonymous on January 31, 2008, 8:30 amBeyond the technology, it took a substatial and very purposful effort to overcome the weight of monopolist incumbants, symbolized as "bellheads" in policy and technology...
Reply | Read entire comment
Why X.25 back in the 1970sBy x25guy on January 30, 2008, 6:01 pmA couple of points to shed some more light on why Telenet, and other wide area networks, used X.25 rather than TCP/IP back in the 1970s. First, comm lines were...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Vint Cerf on why TCP/IP was so long in comingBy Mike Dallos on January 30, 2008, 4:21 pmExcellent!
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments