- Nokia's new N97 vs. the iPhone
- 10 Microsoft research projects
- Hard to get justice in MySpace case
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- Apple removes antivirus support page
WAN experts Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler analyze and share best practices on WAN issues from optimization to management.
In this industry, there's a lot of talk about branch offices and satellite sites, but the notion of satellite sites are seldom taken literally. However, we recently received a query from a reader asking for our opinion on putting routers on satellites and what type of productivity we might see.
Let’s start with some basic arithmetic. A geosynchronous satellite - one that orbits the earth at the same speed as the earth rotates so it appears to stay at the same place in the sky - needs to be roughly 22,500 miles above the earth. And the radio signals travel to and from the satellite at about 186,000 miles per second. This means that a round trip to the satellite and back to earth (about 45,000 miles) takes about a quarter of a second. And for a transmission to make a full round trip - originating point to a destination router and back to the original point (or another destination) - takes roughly half a second.
So the reader’s hunch was right. If the router were on the satellite, then the information could be sent from the originating site to the ultimate site in a single quarter-second trip rather than having to make the extra round-trip back to the ground to be routed.
Even so, we see some severe caveats and think this might be limited to special situations. The inherent delay can wreak havoc on protocols such as TCP where a defined amount of information can be outstanding and unacknowledged. This number of “bits in the pipe” is calculated by taking the transmission delay and multiplying by the transmission speed (time multiplied by bits-per-time). So as speeds increase, the amount of outstanding unacknowledged data increases proportionately.
And even though you can define a very large windows size, it’s still a tradeoff. You can have more bytes outstanding, but if you have to retransmit, you're totally up the proverbial estuary without viable means of propulsion. Even with selective retransmission, you have to wait for that information to be retransmitted, still introducing significant delay.
So we think this technology will be primarily limited to:
- Traffic that is not extremely sensitive to delay.
- Geographic areas where optical fiber and similar terrestrial transmission is not practical. (It appears that the inquiring
user was in a group of islands in the South Pacific.)
Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Jim Metzler is vice president of Ashton, Metzler & Associates.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (8)
CiscoBy Anonymous on April 15, 2008, 12:04 pmwhat a rubbish response! Cisco has router on satellite already....do some basic google reseach...
Reply | Read entire comment
Business models and legacy thinkingBy Henry Hoyt on February 20, 2008, 5:27 pmFirst- you are going to have to move past the fatal logical assumption cetaris paribus...all things are not equal. The cost of flooring communications satellites...
Reply | Read entire comment
TCP performanceBy pgannon on February 20, 2008, 10:31 am You must not have read my earlier comments. There is TCP Acceleration technology available in most broadband satellite solutions today that are designed to address...
Reply | Read entire comment
There is a TCP performance upper boundBy Anonymous on February 19, 2008, 6:45 pmIn 1997, M. Mathis, J. Semke, J. Mahdavi, T. Ott, gave the TCP performance upper bound by a formula. If the 250ms round-trip delay that the article gave is correct,...
Reply | Read entire comment
Innovation is also about evolutionBy pgannon on February 19, 2008, 3:39 pmInnovation is also about evolution, and not always revolution. Sure, if money doesn't matter it would be wonderful to put up a new constellation of LEO satellites...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments