Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

The fallout from the FCC's order against Comcast

Policing the network for P2P traffic
Wide Area Networking Alert By Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler , Network World , 08/12/2008
Steve Taylor
Sign up for this newsletter now!

WAN experts Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler analyze and share best practices on WAN issues from optimization to management.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

On Aug. 1, the FCC released an order with a press release titled "Commission Orders Comcast to End Discriminatory Network Management Practices." The title of the release, which was picked up by some national media, left us wondering exactly what was going on. So we headed over to the FCC's Web site, and what we found there seemed to be a milestone.

According to the press release, “Comcast Corp’s management of its broadband Internet networks contravenes federal policies that protect the vibrant and open nature of the Internet.” So what exactly was Comcast doing?

It turns out that Comcast “had deployed equipment throughout its network to monitor the content of its customers’ Internet connections and selectively block specific types of connections known as peer-to-peer (P2P) connections.” Even though this started because users complained about a few problems, the FCC found that the practice was being used widely.

The press release talked about the problems associated with P2P use of BitTorrent, which brings up the question of blocking any (or selective) P2P applications. For example, it’s not hard to imagine that a cable company that sells phone service could conceivably want to block a competitive phone service, such as Skype, which is considered by many to be the preeminent P2P application.

We were impressed by the level to which the press release cut to the core of the matter. Again, to quote, “The Commission also concluded that Comcast’s practices are not minimally intrusive, as the company claims, but rather are invasive and have significant effects. The Commission found that Comcast monitors its customers’ connections using deep packet inspection and then determines how it will route some connections based not on their destinations but on their contents. In essence, Comcast opens its customers’ mail because it wants to deliver mail not based on the address on the envelope but on the type of letter contained therein.”

We’re not lawyers, but find this decision to be monumental. Next time, we'll discuss the impact of the FCC's decision on corporate networks.

Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Jim Metzler is vice president of Ashton, Metzler & Associates.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure

Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.

Download the Free Info Kit

Next-Gen Load Balancing

Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.

Download the Free Guide

Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x

Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.

Download the Free Guide

Comments (7)
Login
Forgot your account info?

They throttle those tooBy Anonymous on August 16, 2008, 1:31 pmTheir "detection" algorithm is pretty brain dead. It looks for high-bandwidth, long-lived IP flows, and throttles them. Real problem for those of us using VPNs to...

Reply | Read entire comment

What about everyone else?By Anonymous on August 14, 2008, 3:04 pmIf a few suck up all the bandwidth downloading movies, how’s a guy supposed to cruise porn sites?

Reply | Read entire comment

get a vpnBy Anonymous on August 13, 2008, 2:50 amhttp://www.strongvpn.com

Reply | Read entire comment

Dr. Bob Hacker & The Press ReleaseBy Warren Kuhn on August 12, 2008, 3:59 pm"Bob" - Your "Emperor" email is irrelevant to the discussion. Just wear a t-shirt that says you don't like Bush. We'll get it. If we had a nickel for everytime someone...

Reply | Read entire comment

comcastBy Dr Bob Hacker on August 12, 2008, 2:26 pmThe issue here as I see it is that COMCAST has violated the Privacy Law and many other legal constructs. I realize that with our current Emperor Bush the law has...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed