The next WAN challenge: Managing IP telephony
Where are the IPT management tools?
Wide Area Networking Alert
By
Steve Taylor
and
Jim Metzler, Network World
November 06, 2008 12:01 AM ET
Sign up for this newsletter now!
Insightful analysis by consultants Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler, plus links to the latest WAN news headlines
Back in the "good old days" managing telephony as a part of the WAN was pretty simple. Traditional telephony used dedicated
bandwidth, and the major task was to ensure that enough circuits were available to have minimal call blocking. Now, however,
IP telephony (IPT) has become a major application on essentially every WAN and the effective management of IPT is a major
component of overall WAN management. In a recent study titled "2008 IP Telephony Management State-of-the-Market Report Series"
(available at Webtorials), 80% of respondents estimate that IPT would be their primary technology within a little over 2 years, and 50% reported that
it would be primary in a little over one.
So now the focus has to move from simply implementing ITP to managing these systems in an on-going manner. One of the keys
to effective management is, of course, having appropriate management tools. And while the deployment of third-party tools
is lagging behind IPT deployment in general, the report also points out that “Organizations with more complete IPT deployments
make greater use of third-party IPT management products, but all organizations plan to make increased use of them.” This is
most understandable since many companies do not use these tools proactively, and, instead, they wait until problems crop up
that require more extensive tools. There also exists a general lack of awareness of the availability of these tools.
Finally, a just-released module focuses on “Drivers for Third-Party IPT Management.” In this module, the need for these third-party
tools is examined more extensively. Here, a major finding is that, “The biggest reasons that users purchase third-party IPT
management tools are to monitor performance in real time and to obtain improved capabilities to measure service levels.” However,
a major - and growing - need is to manage systems from multiple suppliers. This is a particularly salient point due to the
continuing mergers of companies of all sizes, many of which already have a full, or at least partial, IPT deployment.
To continue reading, register here and become an Insider. You'll get free access to premium content from CIO, Computerworld, CSO, InfoWorld, and Network World. See more Insider content or sign in.
Back in the "good old days" managing telephony as a part of the WAN was pretty simple. Traditional telephony used dedicated
bandwidth, and the major task was to ensure that enough circuits were available to have minimal call blocking. Now, however,
IP telephony (IPT) has become a major application on essentially every WAN and the effective management of IPT is a major
component of overall WAN management. In a recent study titled "2008 IP Telephony Management State-of-the-Market Report Series"
(available at Webtorials), 80% of respondents estimate that IPT would be their primary technology within a little over 2 years, and 50% reported that
it would be primary in a little over one.
So now the focus has to move from simply implementing ITP to managing these systems in an on-going manner. One of the keys
to effective management is, of course, having appropriate management tools. And while the deployment of third-party tools
is lagging behind IPT deployment in general, the report also points out that “Organizations with more complete IPT deployments
make greater use of third-party IPT management products, but all organizations plan to make increased use of them.” This is
most understandable since many companies do not use these tools proactively, and, instead, they wait until problems crop up
that require more extensive tools. There also exists a general lack of awareness of the availability of these tools.
Finally, a just-released module focuses on “Drivers for Third-Party IPT Management.” In this module, the need for these third-party
tools is examined more extensively. Here, a major finding is that, “The biggest reasons that users purchase third-party IPT
management tools are to monitor performance in real time and to obtain improved capabilities to measure service levels.” However,
a major - and growing - need is to manage systems from multiple suppliers. This is a particularly salient point due to the
continuing mergers of companies of all sizes, many of which already have a full, or at least partial, IPT deployment.
Read more about lans & wans in Network World's LANs & WANs section.
Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Jim Metzler is vice president of Ashton, Metzler & Associates.