- Silicon Valley's 19 Coolest Places to Work
- Is Windows 8 Development Worth the Trouble?
- 8 Books Every IT Leader Should Read This Year
- 10 Hot Hadoop Startups to Watch
Insightful analysis by consultants Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler, plus links to the latest WAN news headlines
Regardless of how much progress we make in lowering WAN costs, this remains a major issue in the overall networking budget. And as we move toward cloud-based computing, the requisite amount of WAN bandwidth will only continue to increase.
As we've mentioned in several recent newsletters, there's a careful trade-off that must be considered. You can (relatively speaking) pay a lot for a high-performance service such as MPLS, or you can use an Internet-based service and save a lot of money but deal with a lower guaranteed level of service.
Consequently, there are companies such as Ipanema Technologies and Talari Networks that are creating products designed to empower enterprises to make the best of both worlds.
Recently, Steve had the opportunity to discuss some of the capabilities of Ipanema product with Thierry Grenot, CTO at Ipanema Technologies, and the discussion below is excerpted from that conversation.
Steve: Ipanema often discusses "hybrid networking" as a combination of MPLS and Internet-based VPNs. This makes a lot of sense because using these two services are at the extremes of high control, reliability, and price (MPLS) and minimal control, reliability and price.
However, there are other options available as well, such as WAN Ethernet services and even dedicated transmission services (such as T-3/E-3 and SONET/SDH). Can you please tell us a bit about which services are supported by your Hybrid Networking technology and how a user might go about deciding which services are optimal for their situation?
Thierry: Actually the transport technology does not matter. Hybrid networks can be made of any type of combinations of different networks. It happens that, as most of services are IP-based, in most cases we found MPLS and Internet combined in one 'unified network'. But we also see two MPLS, and why not Ethernet or pure virtual leased lines (like T-1 or T-3). At the end of the day, it is about IP traffic between clients and servers, that's all that matters.
Steve: I believe that Ipanema has the capability for appliances to use a variety of physical network interfaces and logical interfaces within the physical interfaces. Can you please explain how many physical interfaces are supported, and also how logical interfaces are separated within the physical interfaces?
Thierry: Currenty Ipanema proposes up to three virtual interfaces shared on a unique Ethernet physical interface (on the WAN side of the ip|engine appliance). Multiplexing is provided either through TOS/DSCP marking or destination MAC address selection (spoofing). We will also propose devices with multiple WAN-side Ethernet interfaces.
Steve: So, since there are two Ethernet interfaces, what is the most common place for the appliance to be placed? Between the LAN switch and the router? And then the router will choose the appropriate WAN interface(s)?
Also, since this placement could be viewed as a possible "single point of failure," do you have "fail to wire" capabilities?
Thierry: You want all the details, Steven, don't you? Concerning the appliance locations: