- 12 myths about how the Internet works
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- IETF: Should we ignore the Kaminsky bug?
- Top 10 wicked cool algorithms
- How to recession-proof yourself
Unified messaging and communications analysis by consultant Michael Osterman.
Google announced three hosted services last week:
* Message Filtering: Inbound message filtering, including antivirus and antispam protection.
* Message Security: More sophisticated message filtering, plus outbound e-mail management, encryption, attachment management and other services (Compare Messaging Security products).
* Message Discovery: All of the above plus e-mail archiving (Compare Message Archiving products).
These are all services that Postini, which Google acquired last year, has been providing for years. However, the big news is Google’s pricing model. Message Filtering is priced at just 25 cents per user per month starting for a single user. Message Security is $1.00 per month, and Message Discovery is $2.08 per month. Additional unlimited archiving storage is priced at $0.83 per month per year of storage.
This clearly represents a significant downward shift in prices for these types of services compared to most of Google’s competition. Here’s the impact I think it will have on the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) market:
* In the near term, we’re likely to see significant price drops by some of Google’s competition. This will certainly squeeze margins for these providers, but Google’s pricing structure will simply be too tempting for many potential customers to resist. Some providers will have to drop prices simply to retain many of their customers.
* While Postini has successfully been serving large enterprises, the new offering seems aimed primarily at the lower end of the SMB market. This makes sense given the fact that there are millions of potential customers in this market segment, and it will grow the market for Google Apps, Google’s productivity suite. This will likely push many of Google’s messaging security and archiving competitors into a focus on the upper end of the SMB market and into the enterprise space.
* Given that many of Google’s SaaS competitors will focus more on larger SMBs and enterprises because of the greater profit margins these customers can generate, we’re likely to see faster adoption of SaaS into larger organizations than we otherwise might have seen.
In short, I think one of the key impacts of the Google announcement will be to expand the base of SaaS customers at the low end, given that the pricing of these services is now lower than it has ever been; and it will drive new growth among larger organizations as Google’s competitors are driven upmarket.
Michael Osterman is principal analyst of Osterman Research.
Comments (5)
We're of a similar size.By Anonymous on February 15, 2008, 7:49 amWe're of a similar size. Maybe it's more of a neglect of the EMEA channel? Regardless, it's a weaker product and weaker channel offering than their rivals, so I'm...
Reply | Read entire comment
Postini is Good not perfect but GoodBy Anonymous on February 15, 2008, 4:41 amWhat is a big partner? We have about 4500 accounts with Postini and feel the opposite. THe service works Great and have not need much from the channel. The support...
Reply | Read entire comment
All well and good, but what about the channel?By Anonymous on February 14, 2008, 5:28 pmPostini's channel offering was always poor, but since the Google takeovr it has be laughable, bordering on the offensive. In the past I've had to resort to calling...
Reply | Read entire comment
The networks are converging!By Anonymous on February 14, 2008, 2:43 pmThe networks are converging! VOICE, VIDEO, DATA all in one single network! only CISCO could something like this. This is the power of the network!
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: The big news about Google's hosted servicesBy gregarnette on February 14, 2008, 10:08 amGreat post Michael. At Sonian, we saw this trend coming and created the first hosted archive service based on cloud-compute infrastructure. We are using Amazon...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments