Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

How do you define 'unified communications'?

Defining "unified communications" is harder than you think
Unified Communications Alert By Michael Osterman , Network World , 02/26/2008
Michael Osterman
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Unified messaging and communications analysis by consultant Michael Osterman.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

A consensus on the definition for "unified communications" may be harder to establish than you might think. For example, here are some possible definitions:

* A unified communications system routes voicemail sent to one or more telephone numbers and faxes to one or more fax numbers into an e-mail inbox where they can be heard and viewed in a manner similar to e-mail.

* A unified communications system routes conventional voicemail, conventional faxes, SMS messages, instant messages, e-mail, VoIP traffic and other content to an e-mail inbox where this content can be viewed using a single interface.

* A unified communications system does all of the above, plus uses a secondary client for initiating Web conferences and other real-time communications sessions.

* A unified communications system provides users with a single e-mail address or other identifier and then intelligently routes content – e-mail, instant messages, telephone calls, faxes, etc. – to one of several clients, including e-mail inboxes, Web clients or mobile devices depending upon pre-determined rules, such as directory roles, time of day, presence status, the priority of the message, the mood of the recipient, etc.

There are certainly more options than those identified above, as well as a variety of nuances to all of these. 

However, the fundamental difference between these options is that the first three are more or less non-selective funnels of multiple data streams into one or a few clients, whereas the last one is more of an intelligent parser of a single data stream into separate streams that are designed to meet the real-time needs of the user. 

Further, the first three represent the current state of unified communications, but the latter represents the long-term future of the technology.

Michael Osterman is principal analyst of Osterman Research.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (3)
Login
Forgot your account info?

RE: How do you define 'unified communications'?By rmccharles on February 26, 2008, 9:24 amAll of the things you mentioned are potential components or application within Unified Communications. However, UC is not static and can not be adequately defined...

Reply | Read entire comment

not inspiring....By Anonymous on February 26, 2008, 9:45 amIn short, your definition simply brings together several existing markets....e-mail, web/audio/video conferencing, voice (cell/pbx), personal assistant, voice messaging....and...

Reply | Read entire comment

I like to think of it liekBy Eric on March 6, 2008, 3:36 pmI like to think of it liek this: The way that networks have been set-up is analgous to the human nervous system. They allow quick routing of emails, phone calls,...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed