Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

(Comma separation for multiple addresses)
Your Message:

Who should your unified communications provider be?

How do you plan to implement unified communications?
Unified Communications Alert By Michael Osterman , Network World , 03/10/2008
Michael Osterman
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Unified messaging and communications analysis by consultant Michael Osterman.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print

Unified communications involves bringing together the worlds of electronic communication (e-mail, instant messaging, Web conferencing, etc.) and voice plus related technologies. The advantages of doing this are several, including increased user productivity, lower costs, improved manageability, more efficient use of IT staff because of the consolidation of voice into the data center, etc. But where do you start?

Should you add a) voice functionality to your e-mail and real-time communication infrastructure, essentially adding voice to the primary application with which users communicate on a daily basis? Or b) should you add electronic communication functionality to your telephony infrastructure, adding e-mail to the most reliable application that your users employ? Or c) should you scrap everything and go with a solution that combines e-mail, voice, instant messaging, directory services and other capabilities in a single platform. Or d) should you just leave things as they are and operate separate electronic communication and telephony infrastructures?

The decision is an important one and one that you will have to make at some point. Plus, you will then have to decide if you want to host it all yourself on-premise, use a hosted or managed provider to do it for you, or employ some combination of the two.

With regard to the four choices above, d) should be crossed off your list. Unified communications can provide both hard and soft cost savings. For example, Nortel cites research that shows that managing all communications in a single inbox can save employees 43 minutes per day compared to managing communications in separate silos. While the savings from unified communications are likely to vary widely based on a number of factors, it’s pretty clear that unified communications will save users time.

What it all boils down to, somewhat simplistically, is this: do you start with e-mail and integrate your PBX, or do you start with your PBX and integrate e-mail? I’d like to get your thoughts on this – please drop me an e-mail.

Michael Osterman is principal analyst of Osterman Research.

  • Share/Email
  • Tweet This
  • Comment
  • Print
Comments (3)
Login
Forgot your account info?

Email and Phone Together?By pjbrockmann on March 11, 2008, 2:42 pmMichael: voice is real-time. IM is real-time. Email is not real-time. UC is most often about integrating the real-time services together: voice, IM, conferencing....

Reply | Read entire comment

UC more than UMBy tonyryb on March 12, 2008, 11:57 amI think it's all about integrating voice with IM/presence and email and any other multimedia apps such as conferencing that meets your need.

Reply | Read entire comment

Email is part of the equation for UC, as wellBy Michael Osterman on March 12, 2008, 1:18 pmHello Peter: Thank you for your comments on the UC article. While I agree that UC is definitely about integrating real-time communications, integration of voice...

Reply | Read entire comment

View all comments

Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed