- BlackBerry Storm vs. the iPhone
- Digg's Kevin Rose: "We have to do better"
- Blogger warns: "Nortel doesn't make it out alive"
- Financial quagmire bringing out the scammers
- Verizon plays with the wrong e-mail addresses
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Test your Web Filter | Value of WDS
Unified messaging and communications analysis by consultant Michael Osterman.
I went to INTERACT08, a Microsoft conference focused on unified communications. The event was well-attended and provided some good information on the future direction of Microsoft's unified communications technologies. The sessions were quite frank and provided some useful commentary on where Microsoft is today and where it's headed.
* Microsoft admitted that it needs to do a better job at offering voicemail survivability and provide a better means of maintaining function in the event of a loss of connection to the data center, perhaps providing backup capabilities via the public switched telephone network (PSTN).
* Microsoft’s Mediation Server, which connects the PSTN and OCS, is going away as a discrete offering, but its functions will remain and will be embedded into other products. OCS can be virtualized, but the Mediation Server cannot be, since real time media processing does not lend itself to virtualization.
* Microsoft views Exchange as a mature offering that, in some ways, will act as a sort of “mentor” for OCS. OCS will use some of the best practices from the Exchange team, such as the capabilities of Systems Center, improvement of the command line interface in OCS and working with common partners for both platforms. Microsoft's goal is to make both Exchange and OCS “look like they come from the same vendor.”
* Exchange and OCS share some of the same architectural focus and engineering, but different business pressures force each offering to be “out of phase” with one another. However, Microsoft anticipates coordinating Exchange and OCS to a greater degree in the future.
Microsoft is pushing hard in the direction of unified messaging/communications and will be making significant advancements in the future. This, coupled with IBM’s recent announcement that it will spend $1 billion over the next three years on unified communications, not to mention everything that Avaya, Cisco, Novell, Nortel and many others are doing, will make the unified communications market very interesting over the next several years. (Compare Unified Communications products)
Michael Osterman is principal analyst of Osterman Research.
Partner Content
CA Network & Voice Resource Center
Comprehensive Network & Voice Management Visit CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center and get insights into industry best practices, information that helps you to address your challenges.
CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center
Managing Voice Over IP for Successful Convergence
Voice over IP (VoIP) has much to offer in cost savings but some customers have concerns about VoIP call quality compared to the quality of traditional voice services. This white paper will help you learn how to take the right steps so that voice quality is assured.
Managing VoIP for Successful Convergence
The Changing Face of Network Management
Managing your network is serious business. This paper discusses the benefits of integrating configuration change-awareness into your network fault management solution
Download Whitepaper
Comments (2)
OCSBy Anonymous on July 15, 2008, 2:40 pmWhat does OCS stand for?
Reply | Read entire comment
Exchange and OCS are out of synchBy Microsoft Subnet on April 15, 2008, 11:33 amOne of the frustrations users have is when Microsoft develops products in parallel and then says -- hey, they are out of synch! For example, there is no unified...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments