- New attack fells Internet Explorer
- Steve Jobs is a man of a few words
- Oddball gifts for uber geeks
- Global warming research exposed after hack
- Google adding IPv6 to YouTube
Unified messaging and communications analysis by consultant Michael Osterman.
There is a mindset among many that retaining old e-mails will put a company at risk. Many reason that e-mails handed over to an adversary during e-discovery, for example, will contain a "smoking gun" that could result in embarrassment or the loss of a legal judgment.
In some cases, this mindset has been proven correct. We’ve seen examples in high profile cases over the years of CEOs and others who have said things in e-mail that they wish had not been available for presentation at trial or during pre-trial motions.
However, in most cases it’s better to keep old e-mails, instant messages and other content, even if they do contain information that might reflect poorly on your company. Since it’s virtually impossible to delete all copies of e-mail that are sent outside of your company, you might as well retain them – chances are, someone will have copies of them anyway and you don’t want to walk into court as the only party that is not privy to this information.
In a major study on the archiving market that we have just published, we found that organizations in North America are following this course of action. For example, while 32% of organizations believe that preserving all e-mail content for long periods is the least risky option, 10% believe that deleting all content poses the least risk.
However, the proportion of organizations that believes that deleting all e-mail is the least risky course of action is dwindling over time. In an archiving study we conducted in 2007, 15% of organizations felt that deleting all e-mail was the least risky option; a study conducted in 2006 found this figure was 23%.
This clearly indicates that organizations' views on data retention are maturing over time and that a “delete everything” mindset seems to be on its way out. This will be particularly important as more organizations migrate to a unified communications model and need to retain even more data.
Michael Osterman is principal analyst of Osterman Research.
Comments (9)
But the eDiscovery Costs!By Anonymous on April 24, 2008, 9:44 amAs a records manager, I have no problem with keeping email with valuable content as long as it is useful, but way keep a decade plus of all that other "stuff" that...
Reply | Read entire comment
But the eDiscovery Costs!By Anonymous on April 24, 2008, 9:44 amAs a records manager, I have no problem with keeping email with valuable content as long as it is useful, but way keep a decade plus of all that other "stuff" that...
Reply | Read entire comment
Messages other than eMail?By Anonymous on April 24, 2008, 10:18 amCould you please comment on things like Voice Mail and Fax? In many systems these are now attachments to eMails....or are purposely kept separate "so we don't need...
Reply | Read entire comment
All ESI must be retainedBy MichaelOsterman on April 24, 2008, 12:26 pmYou're exactly right. Any electronicallly stored information -- voicemails and faxes included -- should be retained for discovery purposes. While a judge could...
Reply | Read entire comment
eDiscovery costsBy MichaelOsterman on April 24, 2008, 12:33 pmThere are really three issues here: 1) policies need to be created to determine what needs to be kept and what can safely be deleted, 2) good spam filtering tools...
Reply | Read entire comment
Best PracticesBy Delete It on April 26, 2008, 10:25 amThere is no valid reason to keep ESI longer than necessary for a) business purposes and b) legal or regulatory requirements. Implementing an automatic delete policy...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments