- More porn sneaks onto the iPhone
- 'Swatting' case shows need to ban caller-ID spoofing
- Why the iPhone can't be "killed"
- Nortel enterprise chief wants to bring back Bay
- US sets final emergency responder wireless pilot
With questions and uncertainty about Microsoft's Vista, and the emergence of new Novell and Red Hat desktops, the buzz has never been louder regarding Linux as an alternative client operating system for enterprises.
For large and small organizations, switching to Linux desktops isn’t as simple as changing break room coffee vendors, or the company that services your copy machines. Jonathan Reed, a systems administrator at MIT, who manages a wide array of Linux desktops, as well as Unix and Apple and Windows clients, says there are myriad issues that must be thought through before a Linux client rollout.
Key among all the things to think about is a Linux desktop support model. Organizations that have long supported their own Windows desktops must consider if this model will suffice in a new Linux environment.
“If the organization will have in-house, Tier-1 support, they may only need to purchase Tier-2 support from the vendor or a third party,” Reed says. “An organization may also decide that they simply don't have the time or resources to provide internal IT support and may outsource everything.”
If an organization goes the in-house route, the next step is to draw up the Xs and Os for this model.
“Will the organization make its own RPM or DEB packages?” Reed says, or “will users receive updates strictly from the vendor? How will software be deployed?”
In organizations where end-users do not care how their machines are configured, and simply want computers that work, a good practice is to have a central "bundle" of applications or even a disk image that is deployed to all the workstations. "In that case, fixing a corrupted installation is as simple as re-imaging the disk," Reed says.
For more tips and ideas on how to prepare for a Linux desktop rollout, check out Network World’s Guide to Linux.
Comments (27)
"Suitable" replacement for outlook non-existentBy Doug W on June 13, 2009, 2:33 pmAlright I am an old Solaris admin I first started with Linux using slackware in the 90's. That said I just moved my corporate laptop to Linux (Open SuSe) and I am...
Reply | Read entire comment
You may have a point, butBy Anon on August 26, 2008, 12:08 amYou may have a point, but Business People like one or two tools that do it all. There's no way that I could sell them an email server devoid of the deep calendar...
Reply | Read entire comment
This inbred admin resistanceBy Anon on August 25, 2008, 11:58 pmThis inbred admin resistance to a Linux switch might exist, but as an admin I'm less afraid of reducing my desktop support calls (who in their right mind likes those?)...
Reply | Read entire comment
email clients for linuxBy Anon on June 18, 2008, 3:19 pmThe poster was correct that often *nix users are not objective and actually lack this standpoint. No exception here. The point is missed here. There is not an alternative...
Reply | Read entire comment
Oh yes, there is!By Anonymous on March 5, 2008, 8:21 pmEvolution works great! You have to have your exchange server setup for OWA but that seems to be the only requirement. I just set it up and I have my calendar,...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments