Last week we discussed how transitioning to a home-based call center makes for happier workers, better retention, easy recruitment, higher productivity - and overall better customer care. A long list of benefits, yes. But the one that’s missing is the one that’s actually driving this market: cost savings.
Toni Kistner is managing editor of Net.Worker. Contact her at tkistner@nww.com.
Telework boosted by virtual call centers, Part 1
Network World, 02/07/05
New attack fells Internet Explorer
11/22/09
A hacker has posted attack code that could be used to break into a PC running older versions of Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser.
Google Chrome OS on the PC World Podcast
11/21/09
In this week's special (and slightly long) episode of the PC World podcast, editors Robert Strohmeyer, Tim Moynihan, Melissa Perenson, and Nick Mediati discuss the just-announced Google Chrome OS.
LG NAS Adds Blu-ray Drive
11/21/09
LG's N4B1 NAS box is neither a comprehensive media server nor a particularly fast performer, but as a network-attached storage device, it's quick enough for home/small-business file serving. The unit--available at this writing for around $700--is also the sturdiest and quite possibly the best-looking such box I've had my hands on. You also can't beat it's HTML configuration interface for looks or ease of learning and use. But none of that compares to the N4B1's most outstanding feature: an integrated Blu-ray burner, unique among NAS products in the SMB/SOHO market.
Of course, the other “fuzzy” benefits on the list save plenty in their own right. But not enough to get most businesses’ attention. But money saved by getting rid of entire buildings? That message they hear loud and clear.
Time and again at the recent Call Center Demo Show in Dallas, panel speakers said the reason they went virtual was to get rid of the building. To consolidate office space, shut down floors. Again and again, hands would spring up. How did you get rid of your building? How do I get rid of my building? It’s costing me a fortune. Can I really do this?
Another message the audience really heard: “We pay our home-based agents less.” That’s not to say companies are cutting salaries. But when they hire directly into the home, many said they pay on average about 20% less.
Why? The current thinking is that sending someone home to work is the equivalent of giving them a raise of $4,000 per year, meaning they save that much in car gas and maintenance, dry cleaning, clothing, etc. That $4,000 figure was mentioned often at the show.
At the show, Michael Amigoni broke down exactly how much money he saved by transitioning his company, ARO Outsourcing, to virtual agents. People were on the edge of their seats. Hands went up, people scribbled Amigoni’s figures in their notebooks. See for yourself why:
Browse Newsletter categories: Branch Office Best Practices | Convergence | High Speed LANs | Identity Management | IT Careers and Training | IT Leadership | Linux | Messaging | Network Optimization | Network/Systems Management | New Data Center Strategies | Novell NetWare Tips | Optical Networking | Outsourcing | Security Strategies | Servers | Service Provider News Report | Small Business Technology | Storage in the Enterprise | Technology Executive | View from The Edge | Virus and Bug Patch Alert | VORTEX Digest | VPNs | Web Applications | Wide Area Networking | Windows Networking Strategies | Wireless in the Enterprise |
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]