Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
Motorola, Woot 'fess up to reselling uncleared Xoom tablets
How NOT to get a job 101: Hack Marriott, extort execs for work
FAQ about the VeriSign data breaches
Why the House spectrum bill should be ditched: Q&A with Reed Hundt
Google finally scans malware-ridden Android Market
Lawsuit raises questions about email privacy at work
The future of hypervisors
Vendors show voice call hand-off between LTE, 3G networks
VeriSign admits multiple hacks in 2010, keeps details under wraps
Facebook ripe for ridicule as it suffers outage a day after IPO filing
TD Bank gets social for better business
IT salaries rise, bonuses get bigger
Before Facebook: How other recent dot-com IPOs have fared
Obama web site crushed by Republicans' when it comes to download speeds
FBI busts software copyright fugitive who fled to Pakistan
/

Concord advances state of service-level management with Cisco ping support

Related linksToday's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback

Sign up to receive this and other networking newsletters in your inbox.

If you follow the state of network service-level management, you are well aware that service-level metrics supporting performance guarantees are the exception rather than the rule. In general, performance metrics support guaranteed endstation capacity, guaranteed packet latency or guaranteed end-to-end response time.

Three key factors account for the current lack of performance-centric service levels. First, product support for network performance service-level management has been generally lacking, although this is beginning to change for the better. Second, most network managers need to ensure that the required levels of underlying network availability are in place before quoting deterministic throughput or response time guarantees. Lastly, most available products do not easily lend themselves to baselining network capacity or response time from the perspective of the desktop client. Unfortunately, this is what's required to determine the performance targets that should be established.

A recent joint announcement from Concord Communications and Cisco Systems might improve this. Under the terms of the agreement, Concord's NetworkHealth product will now use "ping" technology found in Cisco routers to provide a more accurate sampling of desktop-to-server latency; it will do this by supporting the capability within NetworkHealth to initiate ICMP pings from any Cisco source router to any destination IP address. The result is that network managers can now obtain a reasonably accurate baseline of the round-trip time between a specific desktop client and destination server pair. What this approach doesn't do is capture that portion of the round-trip delay that is attributable to the latency between the desktop client and its designated router, as well as the portion that is consumed by system and application latency within the server.

While no specific product availability was included in the announcement, users can likely expect product support by the end of the first quarter of 1999. The result should be a welcome set of proactive support for NetworkHealth users who have previously been accustomed to the reporting of network availability and circuit utilization after the fact - at least for those users who have a large set of installed Cisco routers.

Reference concord.com for related joint agreement announcement information from Concord and cisco.com for agreement information from Cisco.

RELATED LINKS

Renaissance Worldwide, Inc. (www.rens.com) is a leading provider of integrated business and technology. The Network Business Practice of Renaissance Worldwide has a unique advisory service, InvestmentHealth (tm) that enables companies to make complex network investment decisions simple and quantifiable.

InfoVista broadens turnkey service-level management product choice:
Network World Network World on Network/Systems Management, 7/17/98.

Looking for cost savings in service-level management:
Network World Network World on Network/Systems Management, 6/17/98.

Service Level Management -
Why it Fails? By Char LaBounty, President LaBounty & Associates, Inc.

Users find reporting tools indispensible:
Data on network utilization, capacity, throughput and response time is key for holding providers to obligations. Network World, 3/16/98.

Subscribe to this and other free Network World Fusion Focus newsletters


NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.