Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
IPv6 Week: This Brazilian party is for techies only
iPad 3 rumor rollup for the week of Feb. 7
Free Web tool consolidates data on code vulnerabilities
Why one insurance company ditched its own hardware- for a cloud -based SAN
Researchers claim 100-fold increase in data storage speed
U.S. to use climate to help cool exascale systems
Symantec verifies stolen source code posted by Anonymous is "legitimate"
Centrex: It's alive (for now)!
Global broadband snapshot: Hong Kong throttles the rest of the world
The future of hypervisors
Google Chrome headed for Ice Cream Sandwich Android devices
HP moves load testing software to the cloud
Macs take on the enterprise
FTC warns background screening mobile apps may be unlawful
/

Defining Service Level Management Targets

Related linksToday's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback

Sign up to receive this and other networking newsletters in your inbox.

One of the more difficult tasks that comes with system or network service level management implementation is the selection of the target metrics.

Representative metrics include Mean Time to Repair (MTTR), Availability, Response Time, Throughput and Latency. One reason why selecting metrics is so difficult is that the systems or network manager must be confident that the chosen metrics will actually demonstrate value that is obvious to end users. But does that mean that end users should be brought into the decision process?

For a service level management initiative to really succeed, heavy emphasis needs to be placed on end-user input. The risk, however, is placing too much emphasis on what end users say, because they may wind up picking the "hottest" metric, or one based on the last particular problem they had, rather than on measurements that are ultimately more useful over the long haul or for improving global network efficiency.

Our recent experience shows a potentially more effective way. Rather than an approach based solely on prioritizing service levels, we found that what really worked was a correlated combination of current service usage, service outage hours per month, current end user service satisfaction ratings and service level metric prioritization criteria.

In general, service level metric priority ratings were far higher for those services that also had greater than average monthly usage, higher than average outage intervals and lower than average service satisfaction ratings than for those that did not. By taking this approach, we ensured that service level selection was based upon actual service usage and the cost of downtime rather than the sexiest metric of the day. We expect the result to be an effective implementation of service level management in the way that it was intended to work - improved service quality in response to demonstrated need. System and network managers faced with service level management implementation should consider taking a similar approach for prioritizing which service level metrics make sense for their users.

The result will be a service level initiative that is far less based on superficial end user perception and far more effective in addressing real end user need.

RELATED LINKS

Renaissance Worldwide, Inc. (www.rens.com) is a leading provider of integrated business and technology. The Network Business Practice of Renaissance Worldwide has a unique advisory service, InvestmentHealth (tm) that enables companies to make complex network investment decisions simple and quantifiable.

InfoVista broadens turnkey service-level management product choice:
Network World on Network/Systems Management, 7/17/98.

Looking for cost savings in service-level management:
Network World on Network/Systems Management, 6/17/98.

Service Level Management - Why it Fails?
By Char LaBounty, President LaBounty & Associates, Inc.


NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.