Skip Links

Network World

  • Social Web 
  • Email 
  • Close

What Micromuse means for IBM

Analysis of IBM’s proposed purchase of Micromuse
Network/Systems Management Alert By Scott Crawford , Network World , 01/04/2006
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Senior Editor Denise Dubie guides you through the latest developments in management tools and services.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print

Once again this year, the holiday season brought forth yet another crop of year-end acquisitions. In the world of management, one of these was among the most significant of 2005: the acquisition of Micromuse by IBM, for approximately $865 million in cash.

This acquisition cannot be seen as anything but strategic for IBM, since it closes multiple gaps in the company’s important IT Service Management (ITSM) strategy. It brings a combination of service, availability and security management founded on a strong base of visibility into the network - a base which IBM had lacked, yet which must be seen as critical to ITSM success.

There are overlaps resulting from this deal, not only with Tivoli NetView, but also in areas of application and business service management. However, these are offset by Micromuse’s richer network depth in these areas, which the IBM portfolio had not until now embraced. Viewed in that light, Tivoli and Micromuse solutions are fairly complementary, finally giving IBM’s ITSM strategy a comprehensive view of the entire IT environment.

This highlights the strategic importance of ITSM to IBM. IT is increasingly gravitating towards more of a focus on service-delivering applications. This is leading the network to become much more application-oriented, but it is also bringing applications into tighter integration and dependency on network resources. This has substantially blurred distinctions between the boundaries of networks, systems, applications, and supporting components. Without a high degree of visibility into all these aspects, a strategy for IT service delivery in such environments is significantly hampered.

Micromuse will help give IBM much stronger comprehensive positioning not only against BMC and Mercury by taking Micromuse off the table, but also against HP in an arena in which HP has long been dominant, and against CA since the Concord acquisition.

It also makes for a curious paradox in IBM’s positioning with respect to Cisco. On one hand, Cisco must be seen as a competitor to IBM, given Cisco’s own high-visibility Application Oriented Networking (AON) initiative. On the other, however, not only is IBM a highly visible AON supporter, it will have in Micromuse a Cisco partner that will bring IBM even closer to the network giant across domains beyond application networking. The outcomes of creative tension arising from these seemingly conflicting “coop-etitive” forces will be interesting to watch.

Denise Dubie is senior editor with Network World.

  • Share/Email
  • Comment
  • Print
Partner Content

NetScout and analyst Jim Metzler have teamed to deliver a series of IT Briefs on Network and Application Performance Management leveraging research from NetScout’s nGenius & Sniffer users.

www.netscout.com

Metzler on CIO Priorities

The top five CIO priorities based on a survey of NetScout users revealing CIOs' top priorities and what they think they should be. Also includes interviews with CIOs of large organizations.

Read the Report

Metzler on Application Delivery

How to eliminate the stovepiped or siloed nature of application delivery from both an organization and a technological perspective.

Read the Brief

Metzler on Network Troubleshooting

Overview of network troubleshooting that provides an assessment of where we are, and where we need to be relative to the complexities of today's IT challenges.

Read the Brief

Comment
Login
Forgot your account info?
Add comment
Anonymous comments subject to approval. Register here for member benefits.
Have a NetworkWorld account? Log in here. Register now for a free account.

Videos

rssRss Feed