- Nokia's new N97 vs. the iPhone
- Talk-powered cell phones?
- FBI: Copper thieves jeopardize U.S. infrastructure
- 10 Microsoft research projects
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
Senior Editor Denise Dubie guides you through the latest developments in management tools and services.
In enterprise systems management, the configuration management database, or CMDB, is one of today's most oft-heard acronyms -- which coincidentally has also neared the top of Gartner's hype cycle at one time or another.
Yet the CMDB sometimes gets an unfair shake, considering true advocates of the technology and the processes that support it know the CMDB is not about rolling out a single product but more about shifting best practices to support a collection of up-to-date and inter-related configuration and change metrics about IT infrastructure and applications.
As many of you probably have read over the years, Enterprise Management Associates Dennis Drogseth fully endorses and embraces the importance of a CMDB and its critical role in enterprise IT management. And despite hype cycles, there are certainly other industry watchers who see the value in collecting configuration information and managing change across IT elements. I'd say industry watchers are more likely tagging the vendor promises around CMDB products as hype moreso than the concept and premise of managing configurations as a foundation for other IT service management best practices, such as those described in the IT Infrastructure Library, or ITIL.
Trust me, I am the first one to sing (or is it rap?) Public Enemy's "Don't Believe the Hype" anthem when vendors promise IT managers a product will address all their management concerns, ensure world peace and get their car detailed over lunch. But a recent white paper distributed by CMDB advocates at BMC, CA, Fujitsu, HP, IBM and Microsoft (or members of the CMDB federation working group, CMDBf) discusses how vendor products should work together to help IT managers share configuration, change and other data across disparate sources to create an enterprise-level federated CMDB.
In its own words, the CMDBf's "goal is to create a common specification for sharing configuration data across an enterprise." Formed in April 2006, the group planned to establish a standard that would make blending configuration data from multiple sources easier.
"The Federated CMDB Vision" details how such vendors see businesses benefiting from technologies that integrate and share configuration data.
"This architecture will express the mechanisms for federating the CMDB through standard interfaces without dictating the specific implementation," the white paper reads. "This will provide the basis for an industrywide standard that will allow a large number of management data providers to integrate their data into a coherent seamless CMDB."
Denise Dubie is senior editor with Network World.
Partner Content
NetScout and analyst Jim Metzler have teamed to deliver a series of IT Briefs on Network and Application Performance Management leveraging research from NetScout’s nGenius & Sniffer users.
www.netscout.com
Metzler on CIO Priorities
The top five CIO priorities based on a survey of NetScout users revealing CIOs' top priorities and what they think they should be. Also includes interviews with CIOs of large organizations.
Read the Report
Metzler on Application Delivery
How to eliminate the stovepiped or siloed nature of application delivery from both an organization and a technological perspective.
Read the Brief
Metzler on Network Troubleshooting
Overview of network troubleshooting that provides an assessment of where we are, and where we need to be relative to the complexities of today's IT challenges.
Read the Brief
Comments (1)
Time to consider the human networksBy Anonymous on March 7, 2007, 10:58 amNo offense to the author, the Network Management Forum, and the IT industry, but you would add benefit to many if you raise your eyes, your vantage points, and your...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments