Skip Links

From agents to appliances: Capturing the client experience, Part 1

The appliance-based end user experience

Network/Systems Management Alert By Denise Dubie, Network World
August 13, 2007 08:50 AM ET
Denise Dubie
Sign up for this newsletter now!

Industry analysis by Beth Schultz, plus the latest news headlines.

  • Print

Last week I talked a bit about the need -- or the lack thereof -- of agent software to monitor endpoint machines, such as desktops and laptops. This week I am focusing on appliances, installed at various points across a network to capture the critical client, or end-user, experience with applications on desktops and laptops.

"The ultimate judge of IT and business alignment is the end user; If alignment is viewed as conformity to user expectations in terms of availability, usability and accuracy, then monitoring end user performance is the only way IT knows that it is meeting these expectations," writes Jean-Pierre Garbani, a vice president at Forrester Research, in a recent report.

The report Forrester Research recently put out examines examining the market, which includes management heavyweights such as CA as well as innovative newcomers such as Coradiant. The appliance-based end user experience monitoring vendors had similar technical approaches to capturing this critical metric, Forrester found, but the vendors distinctly targeted four specific markets: business marketing, global application performance debugging, Web-based application performance, and Java 2 Enterprise Edition and .Net application management.

To start, Forrester looked at how companies including Adlex (acquired by Compuware), NetQoS, BeatBox (acquired by Mercury Interactive now part of HP), Coradiant and Tealeaf Technology approached the technical challenge of capturing the client experience. In general, the vendors place an appliance loaded with their respective software in a central location. A data collector component connects to a switch and passively monitors traffic and a reporting server aggregates data from one or more data collectors. This method does not require agents on client desktops, which makes sense since if you are measuring the performance of Web applications most companies can't access customer desktops and place an agent there.

"On the downside, this type of configuration does not provide any insight into what happens at the desktop level, nor does it lend itself to all types of applications: Only IP-based protocols are decoded to provide information; many times, even this is restricted to some application-level protocols," the report reads.

Yet on the plus side, appliances are easier to deploy and maintain for most enterprise IT shops, the report says. It is located centrally and requires just a network connection and some configuration on the box. Also because when analyzing applications, as mentioned before, you are often dealing with Web-based applications, the desktop isn't accessible to IT. But these appliances can capture "detailed analysis" of network, server, database and application response times -- "yielding business-oriented information while analyzing errors" to provide application information, Forrester says.

Read more about infrastructure management in Network World's Infrastructure Management section.

Schultz is a longtime IT journalist. You can email her or find her here.

  • Print

Videos

rssRss Feed