- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
James Gaskin helps small offices get the most out of technology
Earlier this month, I began talking about the new software Mafia, aka the Business Software Alliance (check out "The software protection racket, Part 1 and Part 2"). Two goals this week: get the BSA to tell me what prompts a software audit, and get Microsoft - one of the primary forces behind the BSA - to define piracy. Oh, yes, I also asked Microsoft about how it helps customers prove their software is legal.
Sadly, the tradition of asking direct questions and getting direct answers has gone out of style at the Bully Software Alliance.
Me: What kinds of evidence do tipsters bring to you that prompts software audits?
Jenny Blank, Director of Enforcement for the BSA: "Depends on the case." That’s a fancy way of saying "no comment," isn't it? Further, they "won't discuss the kinds of people who call us."
So I tried again: What motivates people to call the BSA?
Blank: "It's hard to know. Often they are the stereotypical disgruntled former employee. But the issue is not what motivated them, but do they have a story to tell us."
Let's dispense with euphemisms: the tipsters are rats. They are motivated not by concerns about the welfare of software giants like Microsoft missing a few dollars, but by the huge rewards the Bully Software Alliance dangles. By huge I mean up to $200,000, just recently increased from $50,000.
But Blank has no clue what motivates them, except when I asked about reports that the rats are the very software administrators trusted by companies to track license compliance. Blank says "We have no reason to believe we've investigated cases where that's been a problem."
Judging by what attorney Rob Scott of Scott & Scott LLP says, that's stretching the truth. Clients regularly tell Scott they feel strongly the person making the report to the BSA was their employee in charge of software compliance.
But companies will never know who squealed. Blank says, since these aren't criminal proceedings, you don't get to face your accuser in court. In fact, Blank says they'll fight in court to keep the rat's name a secret. But she assures me they "vet" the rats, er, informants completely before proceeding against a company. Guess we'll just have to trust her to really, really make sure the rat is motivated by doing the right thing rather than simply chasing the reward money.
James Gaskin writes books (16 so far), articles and jokes about technology and real life from his home office in the Dallas area.
Comments (5)
Business Software Alliance: Not a fanBy Anonymous on April 20, 2007, 8:40 amYES, they are RATS, those BSE, they are nothing but MICROSOFTs minions helping MICROSOFT to rack-rent people, BUT MICROSOFT IS THE ONLY ONE WHO SHOULD PAY, PAY ANY...
Reply | Read entire comment
BSA hah.By Anonymous on October 30, 2008, 4:06 pmI suppose if the BSA showed up at my small business, I would meet them at the door, tell them "my software is legal", and have the trespassers removed just like...
Reply | Read entire comment
And what's wrong with finaincial rewards?By Anonymous on December 7, 2008, 11:13 amCompanies which can afford to buy software should do so. I don't think even the most avid pirate would disagree with that. So what if the 'rats' do so out of a motivation...
Reply | Read entire comment
TyrannyBy Anonymous on March 27, 2009, 6:50 pmThis is Tyranny and ensure your elected officials are aware of your voice that there wont be any intimidation of any kind of any corporation. The People can reclaim...
Reply | Read entire comment
One more reason for FOSSBy Anonymous on October 5, 2009, 11:19 amFOSS obviates Microsoft and BSA. Any small business owner should recognize that FOSS yields both short-term and long-term financial advantages. If need be, spend...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments