- Microsoft Windows chief decries standards grandstanding
- The 5 best, and 5 worst, features of Google Chrome OS
- Federal government using PS3 to crack pedophile passwords
- 10G Ethernet cheat sheet
- Top 10 free Windows tools for IT pros, at a glance
James Gaskin helps small offices get the most out of technology
I'm a Mac dabbler, not a Mac user. My teenage daughter accuses me of not being cool enough to "get" the Macintosh gestalt, and she may be right. But I'm hearing from more and more small business people who switched, and I've identified three primary reasons for the surge in Mac deployments: lower costs, Intel chips, and Web applications.
I needed a Macintosh to test some products for the Remote control software review that ran January 22nd in the Network World print edition, so I bought a used PowerBook G4 with OS X 10.4.3 running at 1GHz with 1GB of RAM. It seemed to fairly well match the refurbished Gateway Pentium 4 laptop I bought last year, and the price was reasonable.
That's my first point: Macintosh prices haven't dropped to PC levels, but they are closer than ever before. The Mac Mini for $599 costs more than an entry level PC desktop, but at least the Mac has an entry level, which wasn't always the case. An Apple iMac at Frys.com, including LCD monitor, is under a $1000. It still costs more than a comparable PC with comparable LCD monitor, but again it's closer. Many more people are willing to pay a couple of hundred dollars extra for the Mac Cool Factor than are willing to pay a cool thousand extra, which has been the case in the past.
Unlike my PowerPC-based PowerBook, the Macs listed above include an Intel Core Duo processor, and this processor runs Windows as well as OS X. You can dual-boot between OS X and Windows using Boot Camp, or you can get the popular Parallels Desktop for Mac and run both systems at one time.
This solves the common Mac user problem of needing to run one or two proprietary Windows applications. Microsoft did a great job signing up developers to make Windows-only software, and users suffer from that success regularly. But the Intel-based Macs moderate this problem. You still need to buy Windows software for your Mac, and you pay a little more for your hardware than if you stayed with a PC, but you face a speed bump rather than a brick wall.
You could always get Microsoft Office for Macintosh, answering one critical need for software support, but the Intel chip makes it possible to run all Windows applications on Mac hardware. Or you can get OpenOffice for Macintosh, which is free, and easily share documents with others using OpenOffice for Windows, Linux, Solaris, and FreeBSD.
James Gaskin writes books (16 so far), articles and jokes about technology and real life from his home office in the Dallas area.
Comments (33)
Time to take the Windows blinders offBy Anonymous on March 15, 2007, 9:12 amOnce again we see a very narrow point of view on an OS other than Windows. Re: Macintosh surge. Don't get me wrong, I wish there were reasonable choices...
Reply | Read entire comment
To Schyler JonesBy Anonymous on March 15, 2007, 9:40 amI'm laughing out loud....are your facts for the 90's? Much has changed my friend, it sounds like you need to get a Mac and get up to speed on all the recent changes...
Reply | Read entire comment
Mac VS PCBy James Gaskin on March 15, 2007, 12:29 pmThere is no one magic tool available to businesses, there are only appropriate tools for specific jobs. Those may be based on any OS, or independent of all of them. Speaking...
Reply | Read entire comment
Mac switchBy Anonymous on March 15, 2007, 4:50 pm"The Cool Factor"? Sounds like a compromise at many points and bad logic.
Reply | Read entire comment
MisinformationBy Anonymous on March 16, 2007, 11:23 amSchyler Jones wrote: "...you'll need to spend an extra $300 for an XP license (the license that comes with your current PC doesn't qualify), plus a license for...
Reply | Read entire comment
Completely misleading articleBy Scott Rose on March 16, 2007, 11:58 amThe author of this article does not know what he is talking about. When you compare similarly-equipped computers, the Macintosh is ALWAYS less expensive than a PC...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments