- 4chan hell raisers finding fame brings heat?
- The 10 dumbest mistakes network managers make
- NetApp quits bidding war in face of EMC opposition
- CompuServe closes after 30 years
- Google to launch open-source Chrome OS this year
James Gaskin helps small offices get the most out of technology
I'm a Mac dabbler, not a Mac user. My teenage daughter accuses me of not being cool enough to "get" the Macintosh gestalt, and she may be right. But I'm hearing from more and more small business people who switched, and I've identified three primary reasons for the surge in Mac deployments: lower costs, Intel chips, and Web applications.
I needed a Macintosh to test some products for the Remote control software review that ran January 22nd in the Network World print edition, so I bought a used PowerBook G4 with OS X 10.4.3 running at 1GHz with 1GB of RAM. It seemed to fairly well match the refurbished Gateway Pentium 4 laptop I bought last year, and the price was reasonable.
That's my first point: Macintosh prices haven't dropped to PC levels, but they are closer than ever before. The Mac Mini for $599 costs more than an entry level PC desktop, but at least the Mac has an entry level, which wasn't always the case. An Apple iMac at Frys.com, including LCD monitor, is under a $1000. It still costs more than a comparable PC with comparable LCD monitor, but again it's closer. Many more people are willing to pay a couple of hundred dollars extra for the Mac Cool Factor than are willing to pay a cool thousand extra, which has been the case in the past.
Unlike my PowerPC-based PowerBook, the Macs listed above include an Intel Core Duo processor, and this processor runs Windows as well as OS X. You can dual-boot between OS X and Windows using Boot Camp, or you can get the popular Parallels Desktop for Mac and run both systems at one time.
This solves the common Mac user problem of needing to run one or two proprietary Windows applications. Microsoft did a great job signing up developers to make Windows-only software, and users suffer from that success regularly. But the Intel-based Macs moderate this problem. You still need to buy Windows software for your Mac, and you pay a little more for your hardware than if you stayed with a PC, but you face a speed bump rather than a brick wall.
You could always get Microsoft Office for Macintosh, answering one critical need for software support, but the Intel chip makes it possible to run all Windows applications on Mac hardware. Or you can get OpenOffice for Macintosh, which is free, and easily share documents with others using OpenOffice for Windows, Linux, Solaris, and FreeBSD.
James Gaskin writes books (16 so far), articles and jokes about technology and real life from his home office in the Dallas area.
Comments (33)
Mac is handyBy tuomoks on November 4, 2007, 11:41 pmAs a consultant / developer / etc I have always needed to run different systems for different reasons / products. Really VM in mainframe was wonderful but can't...
Reply | Read entire comment
A Mac is an acquired taste,By Louis wheeler on November 4, 2007, 8:33 pmIt usually takes about two month's of use until "you get it." You see, you have been trained in a counter productive workstyle on Microsoft Windows that seems normal...
Reply | Read entire comment
vs Citrix?By Anonymous on April 3, 2007, 1:07 pmI have both Mac and Xp at home and 35 years in IT. We use a variety of OSs in the office, and my staff administer 200+ thin clients. I can buy a Wyse thin client...
Reply | Read entire comment
An open minded IT pro...who knew?By Anonymous on March 31, 2007, 1:33 pmI believe that most IT pros are willfully ignorant to the benefits of OS X. I also believe the majority of IT pros who are not ignorant feel they would be marginalized...
Reply | Read entire comment
Top sellerBy Anonymous on March 31, 2007, 12:02 pmI point to VHS vs Beta- Beta had a better picture, was more reliable and had Hi-Fi sound from the get go. Sears and Sony were the exclusive marketing and manufacturing...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments