Industrial espionage, Part 8: China and Titan Rain
‘Titan Rain’ investigation leads to China
Security Strategies Alert
By
M. E. Kabay
,
Network World
, 11/10/2005
Sign up for this newsletter now!
Mich Kabay takes a high-level view of security issues and provides resources to help safeguard your corporate and personal security.
- Share/Email
- Tweet This
- Print
I have been writing about industrial espionage in this series and now turn to a current case of great value in exploring issues
of who is attacking the U.S., how to manage an investigation without getting fired, and whether Web site operators can and
should block packets from specific domains.
The immense growth and development of the Chinese economy, especially over the last decade, has been accompanied by a rising
tide of industrial espionage and criminal hacking originating from the People’s Republic of China. The CIA Factbook section
on China’s economy reports that since the shift away from a Soviet-style central-command economy, starting in 1978, the Chinese Gross Domestic
Economy has quadrupled: “Measured on a purchasing power parity… basis, China in 2004 stood as the second-largest economy in
the world after the U.S.” The real growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is estimated at 9.1% in 2004, which accords with
figures ranging from 8% to 12% in recent years (the U.S. rate of increase of GDP was 4.4% in 2004).
In summary, China is already a world power and will soon be a superpower challenging the U.S. and Europe at all levels of
geopolitical competition.
Time Magazine published an interesting report Aug. 29 by Nathan Thornburgh about an investigation codenamed Titan Rain that began in late 2003. As an information systems
security officer (ISSO) for Sandia National Laboratories of the U.S. Department of Energy, Shawn Carpenter noticed a flood
of expert hacker activity focusing on data theft from a wide range of “the country’s most sensitive military bases, defense
contractors and aerospace companies.” Carpenter discovered that “the attacks emanated from just three Chinese routers that
acted as the first connection point from a local network to the Internet.” Carpenter worked with U.S. Army and FBI investigators
to learn more about the attacks and the attackers. According to Thornburgh, various analysts judge that “Titan Rain is thought
to rank among the most pervasive cyberespionage threats that U.S. computer networks have ever faced.”
So was Carpenter treated as a hero by Sandia managers?
Well, no. He was fired for inappropriate and unauthorized use of Department of Energy computer resources and information.
I’m sorry for Carpenter, but I have already written many times in this venue and elsewhere that it is a really bad idea to
use corporate resources without written permission from appropriate authorities, especially if there is any risk of being
perceived as a lawbreaker. Even if Carpenter had acquired written support from his U.S. Army and FBI handlers, that still
might not have protected him against termination of employment. I cannot criticize Sandia managers on this count, and I understand
that applying policy firmly is an important element of effective security management.
M. E. Kabay, PhD, CISSP-ISSMP, is Program Director of the Master of Science in Information Assurance program at Norwich University.
Comment